Jailed and To Be Jailed Again

our justice system states that when one commits or possibly committed a crime or violation of a certain law, he will be investigated first by the prosecution. if the prosecutor finds that there is PROBABLE CAUSE or the accused is PROBABLY GUILTY of the said act, the case will then raised to the COURT. once the case reached the COURT, the COURT will then issue an ARREST WARRANT to make sure he will be available everytime the COURT needs his appearance during the TRIAL period. at this point, he has the right to BAIL so he can be out of the jail but make sure he will appear during trials/hearing. remember that there are certain crimes that are not BAILABLE, those HEINOUS like murder, rape and ELECTION SABOTAGE, as our law states, is also a non-BAILABLE offense. the COURT will put the accused/case on TRIAL and only the COURT will determine if the accused is actually GUILTY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT. at this point, GMA is not yet found guilty and remains to be accused and trial is still on going. election sabotage is non-bailable and that made her in the custody of the authorities. she have to prove the court that she is not guilty of the offense.

sorry about the term i used. but once one is accused and arrested, as ordered by the court, he or she will be detained to a certain place. would you like it to be this way, detained and not jailed?

I know these things...but why the jail immediately? GMA is not going to jail yet until found guilty and is not yet in jail but in a custody.

i guess they are just making sure that GMA will no just go out of nowhere. whatever happens with her case before the regional court, she could not just escape. and to think, both cases are non-bailable so she has to face the trials and wait for the verdict.

They have to do all the legal mumbo jumbo. Hard to understand sometime.

LK, first, she could not make it again as the hospital guards are very much in control. not of course when something happened under. alphenor, we are not the law or the court that could tell a person guilty of the crime or offense he or she may have committed. let the court decide as the court deems to be the authority in determining one accused guilty or not, beyond doubts.

The votes of Kapampangans of District 4 were bought beforehand. CGMA spoils the people under her district using freebies and "relief goods", therefore made her gain control over their votes.

i'm doing better with the aid of some medicine. thanks for asking. and how about you, how are you doing and hope you are doing great. funny to fonder but even a child could ask the same question.

anyone been there? at the Veterans? or the prison cell?

sorry that i could not understand, who wants popularity? i only read about the arrest order issued by the sandigandayan?

i think it's not for formality but it's the law the states both parties should be notified everything that is within the case proceedings. meaning, if the complainant has the complaint papers, the accused or the respondent of the said case should also be notified regarding the accusations. arrest warrants though are not necessarily be sent to complainant but to whoever will serve it to the accused. in the case of GMA, the election sabotage case is another case separated and not related to the nbn-zte deal. if however one of the two cases will come to end and she will be acquitted, she still could not get out of jail if the other one is still in trial.

let justice be served to the Filipino.

if only our courts will get impartial, they will surely rot in jail.