Words and Freedom of Speech

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
May 27, 2012 10:59pm CST
http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2012/05/use-these-words-in-social-media-and-you-may-be-flagged-by-authorities/ Remember George Carlin's seven words you can't say on TV? Well here's a long list of words you shouldn't use on the internet; apparently they will get YOU on a list. Still think the government has your best interests at heart? When law abiding citizens get a put on a list that could wind them up in prison? Can we say STALIN? While we're talking about our dissatisfaction with our leaders, are they taking notes? Not to change things for the better, but to incarcerate us indefinately?
3 people like this
4 responses
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
28 May 12
I have read news articles that quoted are wonderful Attorney General saying anyone who talks about the constitution should be put on a terrorist watch list. Than I have read if you are anti abortion, anti war, Christian who believes in end time prophecy and a whole host of others than you are also considered to be a possible terrorist. I also seen where a young lady was a Ron Paul support and worked on his campaign and she landed on a watch list, check out "Fusion Centers" http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1156877184684.shtm https://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/whats-wrong-fusion-centers-executive-summary Than we have that report that the government put out saying returning war veterans should also be put on a terrorist watch list...http://americaswatchtower.com/2009/04/14/homeland-security-classifies-returning-us-veterans-as-potential-terrorist-threat/ So who does that leave? Anyone who doesn't care about the constitution, atheist, people who wouldn't stick up for their rights, who only vote for top candidates dictated to them by the press.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 May 12
Thank you for the excellent links. "I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by the gradual and silent encroachment of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpation." President James Madison (1751-1836) speech, Virginia Convention, 1788
1 person likes this
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
28 May 12
My Gosh, Debra, where do you find these sites!? This is a very disturbing yet not surprising piece of knowledge. Again I point to this administration and their unending paranoia. Socialism doesn't work, period, but it falls apart much quicker if the people it is being force fed to rebel against it. Thus the reason for the list and the constant vigilance against homeland "terrorism". Uh-oh, I think that word just put me on the list.
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 May 12
I'm probably on there numerous times. Remember when during his first run for president, he asked people to received emails about his healthcare reform bill, to forward them on to him at the white house? He called them 'fishy' emails. Remember? The FBI has listed those who disagree with the government, reference the Bible, reference the Constitution or Bill of Rights, protest abortion, support the second amendment, belong to the NRA, and returning vets as possible domestic terrorists. I'm sorry, but anytime the government starts making lists I fear their power has grown past what is necessary. We are individuals. We are guaranteed in the Constitution that the writ of habeaus corpus will protect us from illegal seizure and detention. And that we will have the right to a speedy trial with defense. I have a large following on twitter, so its not just me who combs the internet for this info. Links get posted and I follow them to this stuff.
1 person likes this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
29 May 12
I saw this the other day and posted it to my Facebook. It met with resounding silence (one like only, no comments). Considering it is about monitoring social media, and the words "social media" are enough to get you flagged, it should be of more concern to more people. However, I think that the reactions of the general public, - that is, no reaction at all - is why this sort of monitoring and spying on average citizens will not only continue but will continue to grow in scope. My personal favorites are the weather words. I mean, seriously, do they think there's going to be a terrorist attack using hurricanes?
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
29 May 12
We now have drones flying over us. It IS growing in scope.
• United States
28 May 12
I don't see anything wrong with the government keeping a vigilant eye out for the safety and security of this country. The only person who should be getting arrested is the person that has intentions on disrupting the safety and security of this country. I don't think it's turning this country into a police state, the fact is this behavior has been going on since before the internet came. J Edgar Hoover was known to spy on everyone including the President of the United States, and granted he may have abused his authority, but I think this country has learned from its mistakes. After all we aren't living in a McCarthy era any more. People aren't being put on trial for being Al Queda sympathizers just because they happen to say police. I think the government has to listen in, if only to avoid incidents like 9/11 again, but I will remain vigilant to see if anyone I know is being harassed by the government in the name of National Security. I know for a fact I've used plenty of words on that list, and no men in black have come knocking on my door yet. I'm more concerned that their aren't other words on that list. If these words are all the government is looking for, than terrorist need only speak in code and the government would be none the wiser.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 May 12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWfHHytoByQ Even Rachel Maddow and Keith Olberman (uber liberals) are concerned about the loss of liberty, we have now a law which will give THE PRESIDENT (not courts or judges) the power to detain a person who is suspected of domestic terror (not jihadi terror, DOMESTIC TERROR) indefinately, without a lawyer, without a phone call, without a hearing etc. If you think this sort of thing keeps you safe from the bad guys, think again. Hammas is at our back door and the president, instead of sending the national guard to the border to keep them out, makes jokes about AZ (state) wanting a moat with alligators. "The jaws of power are always open to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing." John Adams "Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master." Dwight D. Eisenhower "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." Benjamin Franklin
1 person likes this
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
28 May 12
http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/whats-wrong-fusion-centers-executive-summary http://www.aclu.org/spy-files
1 person likes this
• United States
28 May 12
The government has always had spies. Even when we were ruled by kings, the brothels were an essential part of the kings spy network, national security is very important, otherwise we set ourselves up for another devastating attack. The president has always had the right to declare Marshall law which allow any law enforcement agency to detain people indefinitely without charge. There is only a violation of liberty when this power is abused. The second amendment is our guarantee that theses officials do not abuse their power, because if i see civil rights being violated as an attack on freedom. I will most certainly be exercising my second amendment rights.