What Determines An Interesting Discussion?

@porwest (91092)
United States
September 29, 2020 5:08pm CST
I am curious what the purpose of the "Interesting Discussions" section of the site is. I clicked in just now and the top of the pile is a post that was written 2 hours ago and has 1 response. You have to scroll down past many 2-3-and 6 response posts before you get to one that has 31. Shouldn't the post with 31 responses be at the top of the pile? And what of so many other discussions with more responses than 6 or 3 or 9 or even 31? What is the basis for classifying an interesting discussion an interesting discussion if it does not seem to have that much interest? Just curious if anyone has an answer.
16 people like this
13 responses
@LindaOHio (178869)
• United States
30 Sep 20
Sounds like JJ has the answer for you.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (178869)
• United States
1 Oct 20
@porwest Yes, he is.
1 person likes this
@porwest (91092)
• United States
1 Oct 20
Indeed. He's sort of a MyLot guru around these parts, isn't he?
1 person likes this
• Santiago, Chile
30 Sep 20
That's a really good question and reflection. I wish I had an answer but unfortunately there are certain things in mylot that I haven't figured out how they work. I only go to 'most recent discussions' tab, and 'Top rated discussions'.
1 person likes this
@porwest (91092)
• United States
1 Oct 20
What is interesting to me, if JJ is right and its tailored to me and what the site perceives as interesting to me, is that many of the times I have gone there... I find little that interests me.
1 person likes this
• Santiago, Chile
1 Oct 20
@porwest oh that's a curious fact I had never heard of. That might be right.
1 person likes this
@RasmaSandra (79929)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
30 Sep 20
That is a very good question and I don't know how they determine the interesting discussion but yes, I would say the one with 31 comments should be on top,
1 person likes this
@porwest (91092)
• United States
30 Sep 20
I guess it does not work that way based on JJ's explanation. I want to say it all makes perfect sense to me, but I have to admit I am still a little bit confused. lol
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (340278)
• Rockingham, Australia
30 Sep 20
As JJ says, it's all about the tags. Some days the list is all my posts because of the 'Western Australia' tag. I don't find them that interesting second time around.
1 person likes this
@porwest (91092)
• United States
1 Oct 20
I have been going there a bit lately, and what is interesting to me is that many of the posts on the list don't interest me. lol
2 people like this
@CarolDM (203422)
• Nashville, Tennessee
29 Sep 20
Looks like JJ answered your question.
1 person likes this
@porwest (91092)
• United States
30 Sep 20
I think I may have, but I am a bit confused by it. I look forward to hearing his response to my response. Now THAT will be interesting. lol
1 person likes this
• India
29 Sep 20
As long as the $$$ comes in I am not bothered
1 person likes this
• India
30 Sep 20
@porwest I can see jj 's explanation
1 person likes this
@kaylachan (69909)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
29 Sep 20
I'll admit, I don't know. I used to think it was the number of likes. Now, I am not so sure. I guess it's content? How engaging the conversation could possibly be? Maybe we aren't meant to know, because then we'd figure out how people get paid?
@lovebuglena (44554)
• Staten Island, New York
30 Sep 20
I think Top Discussions are based on number of likes. Unless that's Hot Discussions?
@kaylachan (69909)
• Daytona Beach, Florida
30 Sep 20
@myklj999 So you say. At the same time, I have noticed that I can spend hours on here. Posting discussions and responding and interacting with others. My earnings very, and may go up one or two pennies, to ten or more. I think one day I made roughly 34 cents. So, it's not as "simple" as you say.
@pjmurphy (2499)
• United States
29 Sep 20
In my observation, the number of responses has little to do with how interesting the discussion is. My conjecture is that interesting discussions are judged to be interesting by someone (a moderator?) and rated thus. They may not be the most popular, just most interesting. But I'm really just surmising. Don't really know.
@lovebuglena (44554)
• Staten Island, New York
30 Sep 20
Responses have nothing to do with it and discussions in that list are not necessarily interesting. They are what you possibly may find interesting.
1 person likes this
@lovebuglena (44554)
• Staten Island, New York
30 Sep 20
I wrote a discussion recently asking about that. It is based on tags you've used. People that have used the same tags as you in their discussions will show up in that list. That doesn't mean that those discussions are necessarily interesting in general or to you specifically. They think they may be of interest to you. I remember I used to see plenty of my own discussions in that list and thought I had achieved something great. Except I didn't.
@Hannihar (130218)
• Israel
30 Sep 20
@porwest I understand your curiosity Jim and that is a very interesting question. I hope you get your answer.
@nela13 (58667)
• Portugal
29 Sep 20
I actually don't know, maybe we can find there discussions that have many comments
@dgobucks226 (35621)
3 Oct 20
Interesting question. How a post rates was something I always wondered about? Especially the ones labeled Top Rated Discussions. Just because a post about going shopping or getting a visit from family gets many responses for example, does that make it one of the best ones. Is it quantity over quantity then? A post which is thought provoking, provides meaningful interaction back and forth between poster and respondents to me would be how I would determine their worth. But like many things in life subjectivity and popularity rules! Kind of like high school I hope your post gets at least an interesting label, lol.
@April90 (148)
• Indonesia
30 Sep 20
I feel you