Love and money? Does it really matter? Well decide on this:
By madonna143
@madonna143 (1737)
Philippines
December 16, 2006 6:52pm CST
If there were two persons you both love, it came to a point that you had to choose. You both like them. But the thing is one had money and one didn't have much. Suppose their only difference is their financial standing, would you go for the money?
4 people like this
24 responses
@sunflowergirl (3064)
• United Arab Emirates
17 Dec 06
well love is imp 4 life...and money is needed to make life and love....better!
@akumei1269 (1749)
• India
29 Dec 06
In my case my YES or NO will be conditional . My choice will depend on the nature of the persons more than how much money they possess .
But from my introspection and observation of myself over the years that has gone by ,I guess I would not choose the moneyd man .
@remaster74 (4064)
• Greece
27 Dec 06
I don't think money can play a defining role. But for many people money are a huge factor.
@miabellacandles (123)
• United States
13 Jan 07
I am no gold digger so the money would not be an option to me.
The true choices would be
who could I see myself with when we are old ?
When we are sick?
Are they loving and good with children? If you want children?
I am sure I would have a lot more questions I would consider too. This is just an example.
The Movie "The Notebook" ----says it all
If you haven't watched it is a Wonderful movie.
That is what "love is about"
Love is a choice and there are sooooooooo many more important issues in a life you share then the $$$
@wm69love88 (3466)
• China
18 Dec 06
i would like to choose the person who i love,we'll make money togather.
@Piratesware (2888)
• Indonesia
27 Dec 06
not 100% I prefer in love but money needed to cause we need for living
@alihas (37)
• United States
26 Dec 06
I would have to say I would go for love with the poor guy because money cant buy happiness. It does seem like it at times but in the end it doesnt. With love you can be happy a lifetime. Poor with love is for me.
@Silicon_Jesus (54)
• United States
18 Dec 06
I suppose it depends on how materialistic you admit to being. I would actually prefer the one who has less money as they tend to appreciate things more, whereas those with money tend to just replace what's broken instead of trying to fix it. That applies to so many aspects of a relationship. Would you want someone who would try to fix the problems you go through or just replace the problems with new ones, or even worse...just replace you?
@malinikarunakar (106)
• India
26 Dec 06
money is something materialistic which u can get anytime but love once lost is lost forever...
@albert2412 (1782)
• United States
25 Dec 06
I married someone that I love very much. Every day seeing her smile is worth more than money. How can you put a price on happiness?
@margieanneart (26423)
• United States
18 Dec 06
Yes, if that was the only difference. But, to love someone, you do not need money.
@euniceeleanor (5967)
• Singapore
18 Dec 06
if in that case, it will have to depend on who loves and pampers me more...who make decision after discussing with me first....i will choose that person who respect me!
@artguy (1474)
• United States
18 Dec 06
Well, money can't buy you love, but it can buy alot of other stuff and if I'm already in love with the one that has money I gonna choose her. It's not like you have anything to lose because someone was going to be hurt anyway, rather you choose the one with money or the one without. So why not have it all, love and money.
@pinoytypist (280)
• Philippines
18 Dec 06
i dont think you can love 2 persons at the same time on the same level. one will really stand out. but suppose given that it do happen, same level of love on two persons at the same time, with ne having the money. then i'll go for the money. i wont be hypocrite about that.