Is democracy the best system of government?
By barbarella
@barbarella (354)
4 responses
@aiguy01 (588)
• United States
17 Jan 07
I like the idea of a realtime electronic democarcy where a tamperproof electronic voting system is set up and people can vote from any internet connection.
Instead of voting on the people who will decide the issues for us we are presented with the facts and we decide ourselves with a 5 day window for votes. The voter can decide whether he wants his vote to be secret or not. If not the votes are available online for all to audit.
1 person likes this
@barbarella (354)
•
17 Jan 07
But then you have people who don't necessarily know all the facts or fully understand the issue responsible for important decisions. A good example in England of that would be debate over the introduction of the Euro. Most people when they talk about this are thinking about it from the point of view that the pound is stronger than the Euro and they also see it as relinquishing some of our independence. I know I don't know anymore about it than that but everyone seems to have an opinion on it. The financial market seems like a very complicated system to get your head round and I feel that with something like that the decision ought to lie with people who fully understand its workings. Similarly as I think I mentioned above, where criminals are concerned, mob rule is not justice but a thirst for blood.
Additionally, there is the diffusion of responsibility phenomenon. They attribute the Cuban missile crisis to this. Too many people were involved in deciding what to do and when a decision is spread over a large number no individual feels the weight of responsibility so there is an increase in risk-taking behaviour. How much worse would this be if it were a whole country. No one is then accountable.
1 person likes this
@aiguy01 (588)
• United States
18 Jan 07
The education issue is a thorny one. Maybe we could put show a documentary on different nights at different times which allowed both sides of the issue to be fully presented and ask the voter to dial an 800 number that comes up at the end of the and enter their social security number to register them to vote on the issue. If people didn't care about the issue enough to watch the show then they probably don't care enough to vote on it anyway.
1 person likes this
@aiguy01 (588)
• United States
18 Jan 07
Unfortunately now in the US, even though the politicians are ultimately held accountable for decisions which are contrary to mass public opinion, once elected it can take up to four years to correct the situation. If the wealth oil companies and defense industry got them elected then I fear the elected officials may feel more accountable to them than the American public.
We would have to stress accountability in an electronic democracy. Every person would be accountable for a decision regardless if the voted or not. If you feel strongly about your position you would need to sell that position to your family and friends. We could hold some mock elections on prior historical issues like the Cubam missile crisis but in actuality an issue like that would probably be handled by an executive branch because of the need of secrecy and to prevent panic. Similar to the way the president can issue an executive order now.
1 person likes this
@yourssaket (85)
• India
19 Jan 07
Democracy is the best form of government, but the way it implemented and used by curropt people has made it debatable issue.
1 person likes this
@limo_2005 (258)
• India
16 Jan 07
Plato's Philosopher Kings is a good idea, although it might not really work for us in this world. In the simplest sense, democracy is rule by the ruled. In a democratic political system, government power is legitimized by the consent of the governed. Consent is expressed in a variety of forms, including annual election of government leaders and citizen participation in governing processes. Democracy is certainly the best system for any other country in the world. If you compare democracy with alternative systems like monarchy or dictatorship, it will be clear that countries with democratic government have made far greater progress than those without. Also the quality of life of people in democracy is much better than compared to its alternatives. It is true that democracy has its own vices. Democracy, even in its worst implementations, does give the people some influence over government. There is scope in democracy to change the system and make it better and better. Without democracy, the people are merely objects to be dealt with by those in power however they like.