Can a women really be president?
By bgreg2
@bgreg2 (45)
United States
January 20, 2007 10:13pm CST
I don't think so. The problem wouldn't be with the president "herself", but in the men who would be required to follow under her. Not alot of men, i blelieve would put their lives on a line for a women boss. Sure, a lot of guys may work for a women boss, but I don't believe they would have enough faith ot in a women as a military leader. In our area, a women was just named as fire chief at the local fire department. Soon afterwards, four of the firemen quit. When asked why, they said they wouldn't trust their lives to a women. Not fair, but i believe it's true. You?
14 people like this
137 responses
@lauriefnp (5109)
• United States
21 Jan 07
I think that the U.S. is ready for a woman president, if it is the right candidate. In the position of president, she would be surrounding herself with the brightest and the best people to advise her in these matters, especially in military matters. In the case of Hilary, you can bet that she could get the job done. What's the difference in having a woman as a military leader or in having a man who has never been in the military (as you recall, Bill Clinton dodged the war and never served in the military, yet he was an effective president).
2 people like this
@bgreg2 (45)
• United States
21 Jan 07
Very good question, but you missed the point. Men are noy willing to put there lives on the line with a women as a leader, they will always question her, evem though she's being "adivce" by men). I'm not saying that it's right, it's just the way it is. Would a soldier in VietNam have gone into the bush being led by a women? Never. As man, would i trust my life to a women's desision, no, i wouldn't. A women president would only see a rise in military people leaving the service.
As far as Hillary being a good president, well, we'll leave that for another post,lol.
1 person likes this
@brokentia (10389)
• United States
21 Jan 07
I do not agree with that statement that men are not willing to put their lives on the line for a woman leader.
Most men would put their lives on the line for their mother...and she is a natural leader for the family.
I have served in the nilitary and had female leaders! And I didn't see any man there having any different issue with her than they had when we had a male Commander!
It is a job! And if the person is not qualified for the job, then that person will not get the job. I would think that if a woman proved herself to be just as good or even better at the job, then she should be given that respect.
And as for those men that quit the fire department because they got a female chief.
She is better off without them! Because if once they questioned her authority, it could cost lives!!! She was hired because she could make those decisions. Split second decisions that could cost if a person did not respond immediately.
So, like I said, she and that fire house is better off without those men!
1 person likes this
@dangerdvd (320)
• Italy
21 Jan 07
why not? this is would be one a new idea! aldo because worse than Bush she could not make hiihihihi not the toughts also you????
1 person likes this
@shivampanchal (174)
• India
21 Jan 07
Women can be president, no doubt about that. Why cant they be president. President should an individual not mentioned that should be an male. For being president certain quality are needed and women possesses it then.......In India there is an example of "Indira GAndhi"
@renestl (99)
• United States
22 Jan 07
I do agree that women can be emotional sometimes. I'm emotional sometimes. Yet, when it comes down to what's important we can set aside our emotions and pull through a situation. I have heard that "Behind every great man is a even greater woman". So, basically women have been president all along, the nation have just been seeing the men.
@bgreg2 (45)
• United States
21 Jan 07
Women and men are created differently, neither better nor worse than the other, but different none the less. I feel women are controlled more by emotions than men. Making desisions by emotions can be a very dangerous thing. I think the women in the U.S. ( the best in the world ! ) are ready for a women president, but the men aren't. If I was a terroist, being threatend bt a women, she better have the backbone to do something. I would challenge a women over a man any day. See, it's not the women who are ready or aren't capable, they are, just not the men. Scary thought to me..
1 person likes this
@gianbryant (972)
• Philippines
21 Jan 07
of course, woman can be a ruler of a country. our president is a woman and i see improvement on our economy.
1 person likes this
@waleediftikhar619 (75)
• India
21 Jan 07
from which country you are . i dis agree with it cuz women cant understand politics and serious problem
1 person likes this
@marytoad (53)
• United States
21 Jan 07
Women can't understand politics & serious problems...??? Where have you been hiding & what rock did you crawl out from under!? hahahahaha!!
Grow up, sweetie! There's wonderful ladies out there, but as long as you think that way, you'll never even get a chance to know 'em!
1 person likes this
@xtedaxcvg (3189)
• Philippines
21 Jan 07
Our country is already being run by a female president and I'd have to say she's doing quite above average. Our economy is slowly and steadily getting back on its feet. We don't look at her as a female, we see her as a leader and I believe that's how it should always be to stop prejudice.
1 person likes this
@pinkeagle (202)
• United States
21 Jan 07
My husband, LB(Lazy Bum) served in the US Army and followed orders from female superiors. Hmmm.... let me rephrase that as it is confusing. All females are superior. I meant to say from females who outranked him.
This was darn good for him too. Made him better husband material after learning how to take orders from a woman.
So, of course, I know a woman could be President, be it Hillary Clinton or Condi Rice or somebody else at a later date.
Also, don't forget that England and Isreal have both had wartime female prime ministers.
1 person likes this
@marytoad (53)
• United States
21 Jan 07
I think an attitude like yours would be hard to live with, no matter WHERE it's coming from! Sounds like he get's browbeaten from you regularly!
I know about how long I'd last in a marriage like yours - - you're lucky he's even still around, unless you treat him better than that!
1 person likes this
@fieryfrost (316)
• Philippines
21 Jan 07
In the Philippines we already had 2 women presidents (1 is currently our president). Anyway, I believe that it's about time women be entrusted with the role of being a leader because I know that we can handle it. I find it discriminating when people look down on women, especially women leaders...like they watch and just wait for this leader to commit mistakes. Why not support them? As the saying goes, Behind every success of a man is a woman, behind every success of a woman is herself...well you can see this because nobody wants to support her nor believe in her except herself and ofcourse other women =P.
@babray06 (1787)
• India
21 Jan 07
Not fair to me also. We cannot presume anything and take actions on that. They should have worked with the woman chief and if they would have found any problem due to her gender issues then may be they can support their actions. I have worked under woman boss and found absolutely no problem in doing day-to-day work. I think eveyone should look forward to the ability of a person and nothing else.
1 person likes this
@SageMother (2277)
• United States
21 Jan 07
People have entrusted there lives to Women from before birth.
Diplomacy requires well developed verbal skills, the ability to process multiple signals quickly, and the ability to empathize, all the skills missing in our present leadership. As a practical matter, women tend to be better at this than males.
The need for males to risk life and limb on the battlefield will become less of an issue as technology replaces many of the boots on the ground, so a soldiers loyalties will not rely solely on testosterone to achieve goals through physical force.
If people can still have faith in or current president, then having a woman in office will be a cake walk.
1 person likes this
@sweetieBerry (235)
• Philippines
21 Jan 07
i come from the philippines and we've had 2 women presidents.
i can tell you - man or woman - no one's been effective enough to affect change in our country but no one resigned as well because the men felt too insecure to be serving under a woman's regime.
for this topic, please don't consider the fact that our country is underpriveleged and 3rd world - for me, man or woman - we all have the different attributes that we can contribute to our countries.
1 person likes this
@emilieespino (963)
• Philippines
21 Jan 07
Of course! The Philippines has a woman President (the second one at that). She is good and tough, and very well educated.
I believe women could be better in administrative and organization skills and people (men especially) should recognize that. The male population are quite egoistic and could not seem to grow with the times to accept the fact that women can sometimes do better!
@cuhkiz (568)
• Philippines
21 Jan 07
yeah! definitely. I our country we had female presidents, the first is along time ago and the next is our president right now. Being FEMALE president takes the ability of being a good president. It dont required gender. Even Gay gender can be president too. :) It depends to the person who will run in presidency or politics of he or she can run his job very well so that his citizen will follow him/her.
@kalyan856 (102)
• India
21 Jan 07
of course, I know a woman could be President, be it Hillary Clinton or Condi Rice or somebody else at a later date.
1 person likes this
@inflamation (866)
• Pakistan
21 Jan 07
Why not. Why a women cant be president of any country. your statement says that a women cant be president because alot of women dont trust their boss if the boss is a lady or a women. This shows the sign of their illetracy. They are even a normal workers but their stubborness isnt over yet. Well if you see in a practical life iif a president is even a shemale all of the leaders who works under the president are even ready to suck his toe then why cant a women be president.
1 person likes this
@7nicole1 (1633)
• Canada
21 Jan 07
i think its possible but your right to - alot of people would take offence to doing waht a woman may rule.
i am a woman and have been in a postion of "power" at a job - i didin't get alot of respect from some of the men that worked for me, especially older ones.
could you imagine if the first woman president was a black woman - the world would fall apart from disrepect.
ROCK ON LADIES
1 person likes this
@gorgeousdreamer (1034)
• Philippines
22 Jan 07
I thinks so. Our president is a woman. Maybe your country is just underestimating women. Women can also do what a man can do. A woman can rule a country. In your case, you do not give your trust to a woman. You treat your women as inferior to men and I don't think that it is right treating us like that. If you would have known that other countries have women who are president of their country, women who are soldiers who are part of the marines or air force, woman who are doing the work of a man. In our country, people do not underestimate what a woman can do, women are almost equal to men.
@bgreg2 (45)
• United States
22 Jan 07
Wow, alot of opinions, thanks. I still go back to, women are just cut differently yhan men. I keep seeing post of how women have led other countries, but I think the U.S. is different. Basically, we are still a new nation, and we as a people are cut differently. ( I did NOT say better, or worse, just different, maybe a little too arrogent. It's because of that, that a women president won't work here. Our men are more arrogent, and more prideful that others. We wouldn't be ablr to handle a women leader the way others have. In looking at the history of countries who've had women leaders, i don't believe it's worked well. We are new country, immature at bnst, maybe it's the immaturty issue, but we're not ready for it yet.
( I have to say, i like this post, there's a lot of very educated awswers here.)
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
21 Jan 07
Well, I think that anyone with a serious problem accepting a female president may HAVE a serious problem because Hilary is now an official candidate and women may be calling the shots this time. If we can do for her what Catholics did for JFK, she's got it and there are more of us.
As far as the military is concerned. Even though the President is Commander in Chief, most military men consider their generals, admirals and chiefs of staff to be their leaders because those are the ones who give the direct orders. As for those military leaders accepting a woman.... They are mostly West Point & Annapolis types trained to think of ANY president as Commander in Chief and very aware of the definition of treason. I believe they WILL be able to work with a female president and filter her commands to their men.
I think your comments about one local fire department are a very broad generalization. Four fireman quitting is hardly akin to four four star generals quitting. But even were that to happen it is a far cry from losing the entire military just as it is doubtful that that fire company will now fall apart. Four guys are now out of a job (if it is a non volunteer fire company)and they will probably be easily replaced by guys (& women) willing to put the safety of the community above politics and prejudice.
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
22 Jan 07
Okay. I assumed that you were making an analogy between the walkout at the fire company and what you believed could
happen in the military If the commander in chief were also a woman. Wasn't that your point?
As far as having been or not been in the military and reality vs bliss, that's just bully pulpit patronizing. Last time I checked I had the same right to an opinion and a vote in this country as any veteran, male or female. If you're only interested in hearing an opinion from those in the military or from veterans why not just put your discussion in the Stars and Stripes.
@bgreg2 (45)
• United States
21 Jan 07
Sorry, i'd rather hear this from someone who's been in the military before. It's a difficult subject to answer when you can only asume what they would think. I was trying to let you know what the general thinking actually is.( been there done that). I do agree, if people leave, they would be replaced, no problem. I was just trying to say, it would cause an unheaval in the military. For the record, when you serve in the military, the one who is your Commander in Chief, makes a huge difference on morale. No one in the military is going to go as ar as treason, but if they don't have faith in their CIC, things will become a mess. I'm talking about the way it is, you're talking about how it should be, reality and bliss, two different worlds.
@Smith2028 (797)
• United States
22 Jan 07
I disagree. I believe a woman can be President. As long as they are as qualified and fit for the job I can see no reason in which she couldn't lead the country.
As far as a military leader, I once again see no reason why a female can not lead the military. There are Female Officers and Female Generals in the military as it is. I do believe they might be a little less likely to take us to war, but still could do it.
@bgreg2 (45)
• United States
22 Jan 07
Ah! Thank you ! Tell us why a women President would be less like;y to take us to war, please. Having served in the military, i can tell you, war just plain sucks, o one, not even real soldiers want to go, but through out history, it has been necessary. If a women President is more hesitant to go to war, don't you think others would be aware of that too. Sure people in our services serve under women, but how do they feel about it? I just plain wouldn't have done it.
@BigBadBurkz (60)
• United States
21 Jan 07
I agree with you too. I don't think men would willingly follow under a female leader.
1 person likes this