Lieutenant Ehren Watada ...
By Ciniful
@Ciniful (1587)
Canada
February 7, 2007 3:58am CST
... would rather go to jail for what he believes is right than fight in a war he believes is unjust.
---------------------
Report from Fox News:
An Army lieutenant who has refused to deploy to Iraq with his Fort Lewis Stryker brigade was barred by his commanders from attending a news conference Wednesday.
Instead, 1st Lt. Ehren Watada issued a videotaped statement, saying he had appealed to his commanders in his wish not to participate in the war.
"It is my duty as a commissioned officer of the United States Army to speak out against grave injustices. My moral and legal obligation is to the Constitution and not those who would issue unlawful orders," Watada said, wearing a dark suit and blue tie rather than his military uniform. An American flag served as a backdrop.
Watada is a member of the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, the Army's first Stryker Brigade Combat Team. The unit is set to begin leaving later this month for a second mission in Iraq. This would be Watada's first deployment to Iraq.
In his statement, Watada said "it is my conclusion as an officer of the armed forces that the war in Iraq is not only morally wrong but a horrible breach of American law.
"Although I have tried to resign out of protest, I will be forced to participate in a war that is manifestly illegal. As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately unlawful as well, I must as an officer of honor and integrity refuse that order."
He said the war violates the democratic system of checks and balances and usurps international treaties and conventions.
"The wholesale slaughter and mistreatment of the Iraqi people with only limited accountability is not only a terrible moral injustice but a contradiction to the Army's own Law of Land Warfare," Watada said.
Watada wrote a letter of requesting resignation, at the army's suggestion, and was denied.
Paul Boyce, a spokesman in the Army's national public affairs office, said Tuesday that Watada is "not the first officer, not the first enlisted, nor the first soldier" to refuse deployment to Iraq. An Army fact sheet dated Sept. 21, 2005, the most recent one available, said 87 conscientious objector applications had been approved and 101 denied since January 2003.
Watada, who is opposed only to the Iraq war, did not apply for conscientious objector status. He said Wednesday evening he wouldn't object to going to Afghanistan.
"He is willing to be court-martialed and go to prison because he believes the war is illegal," Marjorie Cohn, a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, said after Wednesday's midday news conference.
---------------------
Of course, debates are being sparked everywhere because of this man. Many believe him to be a coward who's simply trying to get out of doing his duty, but he's perfectly willing to go to Afghanistan. His issue is solely with the legality of the war on Iraq. He believes his duty is to fight for the constitution, which doesn't support this war. If he were a coward, would he really be willing to be jailed over his failure to follow an order he feels is unjust?
So, what are you thoughts on Lietenant Watada and his current situation?
3 people like this
12 responses
@fayzah (253)
• United States
7 Feb 07
I believe in what he did is good, he is speaking and acting out what our constitution has given us, i applad him on his great courage to fight for what he believes is wrong, maybe his voice will be heard and things will change, but unfornuatly, he did go into the miliatary knowing that there was a chance that he would have to go to Iraq and fight, but the same time, I do not feel that he should have to go to jail in standing up for what he proves is a bad situation and unjust war. thank you for sharing this with us, may we all find peace in this sad time.
2 people like this
@nw1911guy (1131)
• United States
7 Feb 07
I live near Ft Lewis and this has been in the news for months. I totally understand what he's saying and he is doing exactly what you're supposed to do if you feel an order is illegal. The problem is he's going to get run over for doing it. I applaud the fact that he has the courage to stand up to it. But while the military tells you that you have a duty to refuse an illegal order, it doesn't do a very good job of accepting the refusal.
2 people like this
@freak369 (5113)
• United States
8 Feb 07
When you sign up for military service you are trained to defend your country and follow orders. Unless you are the president of the United States, there is always a higher ranking officer to dictate policy.
Why bother to enlist in the military knowing that there is a possibility of a war on foreign soil. This is not something new or something that just happened, it has been going on for a long time.
People like this make me sick. They have no respect for their country, no true colors. War is war. You either serve your purpose or serve your time in jail.
1 person likes this
@gillejc (21)
• United States
8 Feb 07
I don't really say yea or ney but as being a soldier myself many soldiers will tell me the same thing, that its not the war that they really beleive in but there service to others and there country. thats the beauty that seperates the soldier from the politician and ordinary people. Its not about the war and what we are fighting for its about doing your time and serving your country if that is what you decide to do.
1 person likes this
@Ciniful (1587)
• Canada
8 Feb 07
One line stuck out of your post ... doing your time. I wonder if you realize that it comes off sounding more like a prison sentence than defending your rights and freedoms.
I applaud any person with the courage to stand up and fight for their country, their freedoms and their beliefs. Not just soldiers, but regular every day people who make a point of standing out and being heard, in an attempt to make their society a better place.
In this case, this man is doing that by speaking out about something he feels, and millions other feel, is an injustice, and goes against what the US is supposed to be about in the first place. He has my complete respect.
1 person likes this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Actually, this is one time where I side with a deserter. Why? Because he's right.
He's not just running scared. He has evaluated the issues in Iraq and concluded, as many Vietnam soldiers did, that the war in Iraq is unwinnable.
It is not really a war. It is a large number of American soldiers stuck in the middle of a full-blown religious civil war, and the Americans are being forced to take the side of the majority Shiites. So guess what? We're now part of the problem.
Maybe all the officer corps should step up and do the exact same thing and bring all the troops back in time to defend our sovereign borders before it's too late.
@RichardKent (1)
• United States
7 Feb 07
Lt. Watada is a Comissioned Officer of the United States Army & since he missed deployment to Iraq to fight in what he calls an "illegal war", he has an obligation & a duty to serve his country & his unit. Since he's now going through a Court-Martial proceeding, I believe he let his own country down & himself down for not obeying orders as an officer. If he does go to prison for a period of time, he has himself to be ashamed & to blame for putting himself into this mess.
1 person likes this
@Ciniful (1587)
• Canada
7 Feb 07
And I don't see it that way at all. He followed orders, until he felt those orders were unlawful and unjust. He's not whining and complaining about the possibility of going to jail, he's welcoming going to jail over following an order he believes to be wrong. I'd call that courageous, not cowardice. It takes great courage to speak out against something you feel is wrong, and to stand up for what you feel is right, especially in the face of mass critisizm and hatred for someone who followed legal means.
The army has the option to resign, he requested it based on his reasons ... they denied it. Why even have that option available if they don't honor it?
1 person likes this
@Idlewild (6090)
• United States
14 Feb 07
When you join the military, you agree to carry out the orders of your military superiors and the nation's commander in chief. You can't pick and choose what conflicts or missions you go to based on your own personal opinions.
This soldier never should have signed up if he disagreed with this. I'm sure there are many coalition soldiers who don't agree withall kinds of things, from being in Irag in the first place to specific strategies and tactics their commanders make. They they all knew when theysigned up that as soldiers their job is to do the job that is assigned to them.
@Ciniful (1587)
• Canada
15 Feb 07
"You can't pick and choose what conflicts or missions you go to based on your own personal opinions."
Actually, you can. That's why they have the option to apply for conscientious objector. That's why they have the option to resign from specified duty. However, when Watada followed the specified routes, he was denied. He's also been denied a fair trial by having his defense denied, even though it's relevant to the case.
They are simply trying to make an example out of one of many. Watada was not the first to follow this route, and the army handed over many conscientious objections, and resignations.
@treblem (316)
• Philippines
8 Feb 07
he has made a great decision. it's really hard to go against the flow of the motions. especially when he alone shout in the midst of the misdirected crowd. who will listen to his tiny voice?? at least he courageously did. and i salute him for his braveness. and i love him doing that. hope many will follow his lead. and i'm sure america will be proud for another hero like 1st. Lt. Watada. BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!
1 person likes this
@Devinarun (387)
• United States
7 Feb 07
well.....i totally believe him and support what he say....all knw that the war is done not on the interest of lal teh sioldiers ...they are all forced to do it n he is also one of them.poor guy...
@beaniefanatic13 (5076)
• Grand Junction, Colorado
8 Feb 07
Very touchy subject. I don't have specific facts to recite just my personal opinion which is based soley off of the above discussion. Our military at this moment is voluntary, we are not under a mandatory draft at this time. So if you joined the military for what ever your reasons were, you are not in a position to refuse orders as far as I'm concerned. I spoke to several family members and all stated it should be a blatant illegal action to out right refuse a direct order. Since I'm not in the military I really can't say what you are or aren't allowed to do. My personal opinion is wars solve nothing, both sides loose. However I feel very strongly that if you joined the military of your own free will, then you should follow the orders that you are given.
Is Lietenant Watada a coward? I really can't say, as he seems to be willing to fight one war rather than the other for certain beliefs he maintains is illegal, so I would say he isn't a coward. It would probably have been very easy for the military to have just given him different orders, but they chose not to. Why? Example for future military personels to obey orders, I would guess.
Sorry that I don't have specific facts to quote, but wanted to give my 2 cents worth on this. I would also like to say that I don't support the war in Iraq, but do support all of our brave troops that are over there fighting. I mean no offense to anyone! Good luck to you here at mylot!
@andybfl77 (24)
• Singapore
8 Feb 07
I feel that he is a noble warrior for his thoughts and sacrifices. I cant say much as I am not in the situation. However, his thoughts are the values of knighthood. Honor and Justice before duty.
@mitdasein (46)
• United States
7 Feb 07
I oppose this war and war in general, and I would personally do whatever it took to stay out of the military if there was a draft. I support him ideologically, and I don't think he's being a coward, but I also want to say, "dude, the army is all about conforming and following orders, and you should have known that when you signed up." I wouldn't punish him legally myself, but I also can't say he shouldn't be punished, because he knows what the rules are. I guess I would like him to be dishonorably discharged, and if his personal feeling of honor is stronger than the military dishonor, that should be reward enough.
1 person likes this