Do you think terrorists would stop targeting Americans if we left Iraq?

United States
February 7, 2007 3:52pm CST
I really think that the terrorists are determined to rule the world, and it wouldn't matter if we pulled every service person we have stationed around the world and brought them home tomorrow, it would only convince them that we were weak and that they could take over the United States as well.
2 people like this
8 responses
7 Feb 07
I don't think it would stop the problem. However I still think that American troops don't belong in Iraq. We should leave the United Nations to sort it all out instead of staying there to protect the oil.
2 people like this
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
7 Feb 07
The UN had sorted it out, the problem is that they can't actually DO anything. Check this out: http://www.casi.org.uk/info/scriraq.html But anyways, no i don't think it woudl stop. We invaded Iraq AFTER 9/11, AFTER the USS Cole was bombed, AFTER the 1993 bombing of the WTC, and AFTER all the embassy bombings. Not to mention that most terrorists aren't even from or in Iraq!
2 people like this
• United States
7 Feb 07
I don't think we are staying there to protect the oil. After all, we aren't getting any oil from them or any money from their oil anyway. We didn't just go in because Sadam bragged about having weapons, but because we had an agreement with the UN to conduct a no fly zone and the Iraqi's kept shooting at our airplanes. The point is, we are there now, and need to do the best possible thing to help the Iraqi people who are being murdered by their own fellow-citizens by the hundreds. If we ever help them become able to straighten this fact out, it will be time for us to leave. You are right though, that leaving won't solve the problem of terrorists. That is very sad.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
22 Mar 07
Thankyou stringbean!
• United States
8 Feb 07
No, terrorists targeted the US before we invaded Iraq, and they will continue to be a threat even if we leave, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't leave. Being in Iraq isn't making us any less of a target and leaving won't make us any more of a target. What it WILL do is bring our troops home where they can aid in national defense. Yes, it should be done slowly and it should be done carefully, but we need to commit to pulling out.
• United States
8 Feb 07
Excellent comments CatWrites. I certainly agree with you that we need more of our troops at home for possible problems here.
1 person likes this
• United States
20 Feb 07
I think that if American stayed out of the business of other countries, we would have a lot less terrorist attacks, maybe even none at all. I think it is not necessarily true that people would view the United States as weak if we pulled our troops out of their stations worldwide. If you look at peaceful nations, like Costa Rica, for example, that has no standing military whatsoever, they are left alone, they are not attacked or made a target. Switzerland also generally keeps out of everything and does not police the world, and people leave them alone too.
@Profetu (1253)
• Romania
21 Feb 07
the perfect answer for this topic.thank you
@ralevi (1885)
• United States
7 Feb 07
No I don't think that will happen because if we left Iraq they will still remember what we do there and they will want to do the same think to us.
• United States
7 Feb 07
I'm afraid that the terrorists were doing bad stuff to us long before we went to Iraq so if they continue to attack us after we leave, it probably won't have anything to do with what we did or did not do in Iraq.
1 person likes this
• United States
20 Feb 07
The terrorists had attacked the U.S. many times and places before we ever set a foot in Iraq. I can't believe anyone in the "thinking" world believes anymore that U.S. action there started terrorism. They, the terrorists are the ones who claim that the U.S. leaving Iraq is the only way to stop their actions but, as you can see from their behavior at other places in the world, this will never happen.
1 person likes this
@raijin (10345)
• Philippines
8 Feb 07
I don't think it would be stopped.. As I saw on one documentary, there are some terrorists that are from different parts of the world, even in the U.S. to be exact. They made some propagandas and announcements calling out all believers of Allah to wage war against America and it's allies, a Jihad be declared. This I hope, for the love of God would not happen!
• United States
8 Feb 07
I think we are all hoping and praying that it will not happen. You are right, there are terrorists everywhere and, unfortunately, we are raising some of our own kids to join their ranks.
@Profetu (1253)
• Romania
21 Feb 07
Ahem....come again? "the terrorist are determined to rule the world" !??No...they are not...actually the "holy wars" begun many many hundreds of years ago.In Coran for example it's stipulated :"make others beleivers by kind words and wisdom...or by the sword".So...these things did NOT happend now...By the way have you people ever asked WHY do they attack you ?(Oh..and yes europe and america are "fuelling" from there by the way).I personally don't agree that a foreign force should intervene in a country's matter unless that country asks for it (see Sarajevo for example where they requested help from UN)...I for instance am glad that when we had the revolution no outside force interfered we would of considered an invasion as long as we didn't required it.Think of the past...who's right and who's wrong?
• United States
21 Feb 07
I suppose if you want to go into the past, every country has had its share of "holy wars". We aren't talking about the past. We are talking about now. If you hadn't noticed, it is the terrorists who are blowing themselves and others to bits in Iraq these days. We probably would have left the country long ago if they hadn't started blowing each other to bits. The world knows, and I think you know, that if the U.S. pulls out of Iraq, there will be no chance for the people who have elected their leader to be heard. The fighting that is going on there now is a struggle for power by those who are not interested in allowing free elections to take place. They want to continue a Sadaam type government run by themselves as dictators. (America gets a large amount of its crude oil in South America. You might want to check your facts a little more closely.)
• United States
23 Feb 07
We do not impose our beliefs on other countries, as is evidenced by many places that HAVE asked for help our help, but still believe completely contrary to what we believe. What we are asking in Iraq is that the people be free to choose their own leader. If they choose to elect a Shiite, Sunni, or Kurd, it is nothing to us, as long as it is the free will of the people. People are very fond of saying that "Sure, America likes to throw money at the problems of the world, but always has strings attached." Believe me, you are wrong if you think all the foreign aid we have given to the world has been for our benefit. The world is happy to grab our money with one hand and send terrorists to blow us up with the other.
@Profetu (1253)
• Romania
21 Feb 07
"Now" it's a consequence of the past.Their doing it with a reason...that of letting them go...they really see you as the invaders.How should i put this more clear : yeah thank your for the support in the "Saddam" matter....but now get out.We were the same...no chance for a leader,,,the leader selected was the one who betrayed Ceausescu and so on...but after "political war" begun...WE chose who will be our president etc.I say leave them be...if they cannot fight and ASK for support them help them...OTHERWISE let them BE as they want to be.Just because you have a system that works that does'n mean that they want it.DO NOT IMPOSE YOUR BELEIVES!ps : search wikipedia top petroleum exporting and importing countries!
@jenalyn (675)
• United States
21 Mar 07
I completely agree with you. They would still attack and it would be even worse. They would say that we are weak and would make their attacks more frequent and far more tragic. I think that people that believe that we can sit down and reason with them are really delusional. I have heard people say that if we took our soldiers out and then talked to them we would get further. That is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
22 Mar 07
It absolutely has nothing to do with where we are, who we're friends with or how nice we are to the leaders of the world. I think Clinton proved that rather nicely. How do you negotiate with someone who is driven soley by deep faith to kill you and your kind in the interests of weeding out non-believers? Do you think durring the inquisition that jews could have negotiated with the church and stop the horrendous acts that they were endurring? Could the people in Salem or England have been more diplomatic with the fundamental christain courts and been spared being accused and hanged as a witch? Or durring the crusaides, if the turks and arabs were a little nicer to the eurpean armadas that they would not have been so thought of savages? It has nothing to do with any of the buzzphrases the "feel-good" crowd likes to regurgitate on a daily basis, it, like many other events in history, is driven by a deeply embraced philosophy. I in another post qoted the former leader of al' qeiada in iraq, Zarqaui, "democracy is un-islamic". Or Bin laden's right hand man to the western nations, "convert to islam, or die" I think they said it better than i ever could have