Should smoking in a car be illegal when a child is a passenger?
@ConservativeArtist (201)
United States
February 7, 2007 8:27pm CST
I heard a snippet on the news today that a city councilman in Aurora, CO is trying to introduce a citywide ban on smoking in a car when a child is present. Read the article on http://www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=64337
What do you think? Should there be a ban on smoking in a car when a child is present? If so, what should the fine be?
If there should be a ban for smoking in the car, then what about smoking in a house when a child is present in the room?
It's a classic debate of public health vs. too much government intervention. I look forward to your thoughts.
17 people like this
107 responses
@dhavalhirdhav (181)
• India
8 Feb 07
smoking should be ban everywhere and everytime.. the reason is.. when you drink you harm only yourself.. but when you smoke.. you are harming everyone.
3 people like this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
What if you smoke alone in your house? What if you smoke in a park, and there is nobody around you for at least 50 feet? Should smoking be banned then?
1 person likes this
@kathy77 (7486)
• Australia
8 Feb 07
Yes well I don't blame them I do think it should be illegal and I am a smoker but where children are concerned I do not like to smoke around them whether I am smoking or not. We are trying to change the law in Australia if we haven't already as I haven't heard the news the last couple of nights. I think that the fine should be around $200 that may stop them. Our government has already stopped smoking in the their governement houses whether there is a child there or not.
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
It sounds like Australia and America are on parallel tracks when it comes to smoking. In Aurora, Colorado, the proposed ban is $50.
The times certainly are changing, but in this case, I think it is a positive change.
1 person likes this
@hitzphillygirl (1235)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Yes. Parents who smoke need to stop being so selfish and think about their children's health.
2 people like this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
thanks for the response. I smoke, and have a little baby girl, but I would NEVER smoke in the same house as my child, let alone an enclosed space like a car.
1 person likes this
@vinaykiran28 (5149)
• India
8 Feb 07
Conservative Artist - i advice you to quit smoking, its not good for you as well as others
@jmcafam (2890)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Smoking in the presence of children should not be allowed. I don't really see them inforcing it if it is made a law. Sad but I just think that will happen.Even smoking in homes with kids, bad news. At least some parents so outside to do it.
2 people like this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Thank you for the response. I smoke, but I do it outsiDE. I am not sure it a law will be enforced, but at least if there is a law, it CAN be enforced.
1 person likes this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
I don't believe that the government should come in the house to check. I think that because a is not technically as private, and because of its more confined space, its ok to draw the line at a ban of smoking in cars- if there are children present. Normally, I would not want government interference, and I would never want government interference in my own home. This involves childrens' health, so an exception should be made.
1 person likes this
@flagbabygirl (891)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Most people who smoke don't smoke in the house with their children, Do you want the Government coming in your hoiuse to check? Too much Power to the Government
2 people like this
@LindaLou (483)
• Canada
8 Feb 07
Yes, I agree with this wholeheartedly. Kids can't protect themselves from second-hand smoke, so if the parents won't butt out voluntarily for their kids' health, someone's got to step in. My husband smokes and I don't and I sometimes feel like I am held hostage to his second-hand smoke. I hate it! But I am adult and I can choose to tell him to stop, to put up with it or to leave. Kids don't have these choices.
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Thanks for your response. Despite my usual rants on the importance of limited government intervention, I think that this one is a good idea. But here's a question: What counts as a kid? My thought would be children under the age of 16 years old.
1 person likes this
@coffebing (252)
• Malaysia
8 Feb 07
Ban smoking in a car when child is present.i certainly agree.Smoking is bad for health and as an adult he or she should know bout it.Other than that, being together with someone smoking can be even worst especially child.They are still young and innocent.They have their own right to have a healty life style.
3 people like this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Since it has been proven that secondhand smoke is very damaging to little lungs, I can't imagine how a parent can smoke near their child. I always made my husband go outside, and that was almost 30 years ago. A child can develop chronic lung problems which haunt them throughout life from breathing in the smoke. My stepdaughter is a good example. Both of her parents smoked around her, and she's had so many respiratory problems. I may have some problems that way, too. My parents smoked when I was really little, but they both quit by the time I was 5. I still have a lot of respiratory problems including asthma, allergies, and numerous bouts with bronchitis and pneumonia. I guess since parents don't have the good sense to refrain from smoking around their children, the government needs to step in. After all, someone has to stick up for the children!
1 person likes this
@jmp824 (741)
• Philippines
9 Feb 07
I prioritize the health of my family especially the kids. So at home I disallow smoking inside my home premises, especially when kids are around. Good that my hubby seldom smokes and he already knew it that i dont allow it at home, so he'll do it either at work during breaktime or during nightouts with friends. In this way we can avoid different kinds of lung diseases, which can threaten ones life. The one who receives the smoke from the one smoking is more likely to get sick than the one doing it.
@jmp824 (741)
• Philippines
9 Feb 07
yeah i'd like to mention also that even at home or in car, smoking is ban.
i agree there should be a law to prohibit smoking publicly. or the government could just have a place for smokers. if somebody feels like smoking, he can just go to this place and have his smoke there. might be not possible to have a smoking areas. if it will be then there will be thousands of smoking areas to be installed to accomodate the increasing number of smokers. :)
@gloria777 (1674)
• India
8 Feb 07
In my opinion anything which hurts others is illegal. So ofcourse smoking in a car is not allowed when a non smoker or a child is present.
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
I would draw the line at children. I would always ask a non-smoker if they mind me smoking in the car with them out of respect (this is in my car- not theirs. I wouldn't smoke in their car.) But I will not give a non-smoker control over my car, and certainly not the government. How could a police officer enforce this with a non-smoking adult, anyway? Pull you over and ask if the passenfer is a non-smoker? Now it becomes a slippery slope.
1 person likes this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
20 Feb 07
Other adult passengers have the freedom not to ride in the car with me. So you are right, they do not need to take the smoke too, If they don't like it, they can ride with someone else. Children don't have that choice.
@charlazio (215)
• Italy
8 Feb 07
here in rome, i see people smoking while their cradling a new born infant in their arms! that said, the govt needs to stop trying to regulate everyone's lives. i mean, look at the generation that grew up in the fifties, mom was drinking booze, smoking, taking all kinds of pills and breathing asbestos, they turned out alright, didn't they? your children are your property, that may sound wrong but the parent should be the ultimate authority. of course, there are some exceptions.
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
9 Feb 07
I went to Scotland, and noticed that far more people smoke in malls, around kids, etc. It was interesting. One important thing to note is that many moms in the fifties did not smoke or drink. I think also, the children of ones that did are probably the evidence for what we know about smoking now.
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
8 Feb 07
It is too much GOVERNMENT CONTROL.
What there should be a ban on is councilmen\women (this includes Senators, Representatives, cops, robbers, and scum) trying to control the masses.
Is this freedom? For them it is freedom to bully, control. For us we must comply or get fined. CRAZY MIXED UP NUTS.
@onabreak2 (1161)
• United States
8 Feb 07
This is a very good question being asked here.
It is of course the government trying to squeeze in one other law. I dont think it can be enforced though. Just like smoking in public places. There is not enough police to enforce it.
I dont think it is good to smoke in the car with children. It is a smelly bad habit . People should have better sense then that. But some of them dont.
@shiningfae (403)
• United States
8 Feb 07
I don't think it's too much government control. If you beat your kids, the government steps in. If you neglect your kids, the government steps in. If you expose them to unnecessary health risks, the government should step in. I don't see how this is much different than the current social services situation.
@ckloeckner (216)
• United States
8 Feb 07
my opinion is it is ok for smokers to ruin thier bodies but not thier or anybody elses children for the sake of their health
1 person likes this
@shivani234 (37)
•
8 Feb 07
I think its not fair to make a child suffer because of your own addictions.If parents don't realise it..its too bad and in these cases govt intervention is justified
1 person likes this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
I agree- but only for a car ban.
1 person likes this
@elizabeth525 (654)
• United States
8 Feb 07
it really does not matter where you smoke whether it be outside, inside, away fro myour kids. The smoke stays ON your clothes and I have read somewhere that THAT is just as bad. It would be nice to ban smoking around kids in general but sadly I dont see it happening. People would say that it would be getting way of their rights or soemthing. What about the kids' rights?
@rdolphingirl (361)
• United States
22 Feb 07
While I do think that the government is trying to (and succeeding too often) take away too many rights of parents, I happen to agree with this issue. I think its really a sad comment on the parents who are so self-centered, uncaring, passive, etc. that they don't even care that something they indulge in (smoking or other things) is detrimental to the health and well being of their children!
Do I think the government making these new laws will really help that much? .. No I don't, even if they get SOME parents to stop smoking in a car with their children, this is not enough to keep these kids safe.
If a person chooses to ruin their own health, that is their choice, ruining the health of an innocent child is another issue. I would be willing to bet that these children are not being cared for the best in other ways too. This really isn't a simple matter at all.
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Out of respect, I ask before I smoke in my car when there is a non-smoker, just the same as I ask what kind of music I listen to. BUT I HAVE ULTIMATE CONTROL, and don't want the government telling me I can't smoke in my car because there are non-smoking adults. Adults don't need to ride with me. They can choose other transportation, if they are so concerned. Children don't have that choice.
@pranaydharmale (138)
• India
8 Feb 07
Yes, i think smoking should be made illegal in car when a baby is a passenger . People who do so can be bound by law only to prevent early age respiratory diseases for children nearby.
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
9 Feb 07
thanks for the comment. There does seem to be a strong link between second hand smoke and early childhood respiratory diseases, as well as some correlation with SIDS as well.
@buldwgz (1489)
• United States
8 Feb 07
Of course this is a positive ban. It is different with older people because they can voice their opinion, babies cannot, and even young children tend to not voice their opinion to their parents. Funny thing is if one chooses not to smoke they hurt no one, if one chooses to smoke they hurt EVERYONE around them. I don't smoke, but have family members that do. I find it extremely selfish when one lights up around people that do not. It gives us no choice at all but to breath what they put into the air. This is a positive ban to help protect those who can't protect themselve.s
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
8 Feb 07
I didn't croak when Grampa smoked with me around.
Selfish is people who want to control others because of what others choose to do.