have you ever heard of scheduling a baby's feedings??
By Joey322
@Joey322 (272)
United States
February 23, 2007 12:12pm CST
my son is 5 months old and he is fed whenever he is hungry. i feel that he is too small to be on a schedule and my doctor agreed that he should be fed when he is hungry b/c babies do not overeat. he said that the only time he really worries about a baby being overweight is when they are 2 and 3 years old and they are getting a bunch of junk food.
ANYWAY....
in my son's daycare class is a new baby. she is 6 months old and while i was visiting him at my lunch break the new baby girl was fussing. the one caregiver said "i know honey, but it's not time yet. momma said it's not time." she was trying to soothe the poor baby and was rocking her and playing with her.
i can be a bit nosy, so i asked what was wrong and they told me that mom has the baby on a feeding schedule and they aren't allowed to feed her unless it's her designated time to eat.
i don't like to judge, so is there a medical reason why mom would have her eating like this?? have you scheduled your baby's feedings? what is the reason to do this??
i don't understand.
thanks!
15 people like this
43 responses
@msmonkeyfeet (789)
• United States
23 Feb 07
The only reason I could think of that a mother would put her baby on a feeding schedule is if she wants it to be more convenient for her (not the baby) and to get the baby to only eat at certain times of the night. Personally I don't think it's fair to put a baby through that, as your doctor said, they don't overeat so they should be allowed to eat when they're hungry. I'm sure that mother wouldn't like it if someone told HER she couldn't eat when she was hungry and could only eat at certain times!
3 people like this
@retardedrugrat (4791)
• Canada
23 Feb 07
I think most of the time it's down the the mothers personal choice. I have never personally fed my babies on a schedule, but a friend of mine who gave birth in January had her baby on a feeding schedule till he was 4 weeks old.
I'm not sure what the reasoning for this was and I didn't ask. I didn't even know till she said that they were going to start feeding him when he was hungry as opposed to set times.
When I had my youngest Son, in the hospital there was a 4 bed ward and then a couple of private rooms in use. Having had a C Section, I was in a private room.
One of the girls in the 4 bed ward came up the corridor with her baby looking extremely disgruntled. She said that one of the girls was feeding her baby on a time schedule instead of when he was hungry. This lady was apparently trying to force her baby to eat and he was crying his little heart out. He just wasn't hungry. When one of the other girls pointed that out to her, she snapped back "I know what I'm doing!"
So I think unless there is actually a medical reason, it must come down to choice. I always fed my babies when they wanted feeding and that worked for me.
2 people like this
@wmaharper (2316)
• United States
23 Feb 07
When babies are that young, it's really not good to feed them on a shcedule, you feed them when they are hungry, unless they have gone TOO long w/out eating. Sometimes newborns will sleep through a feeding and that is not good. I know when I had my last one, he wouldn't wake up to eat, he went more than 3 hours w/out eating, and I got yelled at (: but I tried everything to get him to eat, but he was SO sleepy, i even took off all of his clothes, and he still would NOT wake up.. SO I waited for a half an hour and tried to wake him again. Eventually he woke up and ate a little and then went back to sleep. Most doctors will advise you to feed them when they are hungry when they are so young I would not even consider putting a baby on a schedule until they were at least 4 months old and sleeping through the night.
1 person likes this
@wmaharper (2316)
• United States
23 Feb 07
I have been trying to keep mine on a schedule, my oldest was on a schedule by 5 months, but the youngest one has proven to be most difficult. Schedules/routines are great for babies, so they know what is coming next, so you can plan you day, having said that, sometimes babies ARE hungry before the next feeding time, and I think sometimes parents allow their schedules to govern them too much, when considering a schedule for your baby, you always need to remember that it is there to serve you, not vice versa. Some people, will not be flexible in fear that the whole day will be ruined, and their little babies suffer because of it. There are times however, when a baby cries hungry and doesn't really need to be fed. We are going through some sleeping problems with our 5 month old right now, he was sleeping through the night just fine, since he was 2 months old, but at 4 months he got his first teeth, and started waking up again. Now he is waking out of habit (I know it is habit, not hunger, because he will only nurse for a couple minutes and then fall asleep, he barely even takes anything in, sometimes children will start waking in the middle of the night to eat due to a growth spurt, but they will take a full feeding before they go back to sleep) and we have been trying to get him to go to sleep w/out eating. It's been 2 nights, and he did much better last night, only waking once, and he didn't eat, just went back to sleep, we are hoping we can get him to start sleeping through again by the end of the weekend. There really isn't any "medical" reason to have a baby on a schedule, it is a lot more convenient and it is generally easier on the baby. Babies who are on a schedule are usually more content because they sleep better, and eat better, when it happens around the same time everyday. Also though, I personally would never ask a daycare provider to be so strict on a schedule like that, as I have worked with children for many years, and it is difficult tending to more than one child, especially when one is crying and you can't do anything for them. To have a schedule or not to, is a personal decision, that every family must make for their own children.
2 people like this
@wmaharper (2316)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Most babies put themselves on a schedule.. Mine did (the oldest, the youngest has been a little haywire.. ) (;
Eating every 3-4 hours, and they generally wake up at the same time, and eat when they wake up. I think some people think of a schedule as a rigid time frame that they force their babies to comply to, I see it more as a framework, that my baby already falls into, and me trying to help him stay with it. Like he usually takes a nap at 10:00, so I put him down at 9:50 to sleep and he usually eats at 12:00 so I feed him then. Sometimes he wakes up early and if he's not particularly hungry, I'll distract him for the half an hour until his next feeding, but if he wakes up hungry, I feed him. But my youngest has proven to be most difficult, He isn't sleeping consistently yet, so I haven't really tried much with a feeding schedule. (many people will try it the other way around, get the feedings down, then the sleeping, but that usually proves to be ineffective) But like I said, a feeding schedule should be loose and never too rigid where you are making your children wait to eat, when they are really hungry. Most people have schedules for their babies, they just don't call it that, but it's a natural order that their babies fall into. And like I said previously, it all depends on the person and their preferences. It is probably much easier for me to keep my boys on a schedule than someone who works, because I stay at home with them all day, which also means, it's much more important or necessary that they have a consistent schedule. I hope I have shed some light on this for you.
1 person likes this
@Joey322 (272)
• United States
23 Feb 07
i understand the sleeping schedule, that makes sense and babies can do well with a sleeping schedule. my son was born with a sleeping schedule, but his eating habits are constantly changing. he may be on a routine for a month and then it will change....
i just found it odd to have a 6 month old on a feeding schedule. poor thing was so sad.
1 person likes this
@michelledarcy (5220)
•
23 Feb 07
I think routines are good for babies. My first baby was on a routine and she was fine on it. My second didn't like it and ended up making up her own regular routine. However if they were hungry early I would never make them wait, it isn't fair.
2 people like this
@Joey322 (272)
• United States
23 Feb 07
routines are good for the babies, like a sleeping routine maybe...i don't think forcing a feeding one is right, though.
i mean, she was crying b/c she was hungry and they had to follow mom's directions and not feed her until a certain time.
i just don'tthink i can agree with that.
1 person likes this
@mememama (3076)
• United States
23 Feb 07
I personally disagree with putting babies on a schedule, especially for feedings. Babies grow so fast during that time, they have growth spurts and get hungry earlier than normal sometimes. You need to feed the baby, I don't know, it just seems like a natural thing to do, baby is hungry=feed the baby! I've never had any kind of schedule for my son, after awhile he got into his own routine as far as eating and sleeping, so I just follow that.
2 people like this
@lillake (1630)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Some parents try to force their children to fit into their lives rather than adjust their lives to welcome the new baby. Scheduling feedings, sleeping, and the such make it easier for the parent and gives them a feeling of being in control. Some parents think that children as little as newborns can somehow be "spoiled" and try to counter act that by depriving them of their needs in order to "teach him who is the boss." Personally, I think infants are far too young to be scheduled and should be allowed to eat and sleep when their bodies need them to.
@cherhost (1072)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Well my kid did it all on her own. She ate at 8am,12pm,4pm and 8pm. That is what she wanted. I never said no to her. She put herself on that shcedule at about 4 or 5 months. At 6 Months old I would see she got fussy an hour towards feeding time I would just give her juice. Since she was already on it I just kept her on it. But I never had her on a schedule when she was younger. Some people find it better ot have them on a schedule... for themselves and the kid as a routine. Who knows.
2 people like this
@Marie2473 (8512)
• Sweden
23 Feb 07
That sounds strange to me, coz like your doctor said, babies are not likely to overeat. there might be some medical reason behind it, or maybe the mother is just like this.
I know that my friend has her child ona schedual when it is the fathers time to take him, but that is more for the sake of the baby beeing fed at all, wich he probably wouldn´t without this schedual since the father is the most irresponsible man ever!
1 person likes this
@p3halliwel2005 (3156)
• Philippines
24 Feb 07
Yes I have heard of scheduled feeding but I didn't follow that as well..Babies don't over feed themselves..I noticed when my baby cries and I try to give him a bottle he pushes it away because he has colic...so I burp him right away and he stops crying..sometimes baby cries for different reasons and not only because they are hungry.
@trinidadvelasco (11401)
• Philippines
23 Feb 07
Yes, I have heard of babies feeding schedule. My doctor once told me about it. It is intended for moms who may get too busy as to forget to feed the child. I was told that I will have to set an alarm clock for the purpose. When I told him that there's no worry regarding feeding time because I will always hear the baby whenever he cries, I was told that it will be okay to feed the baby each time he cries. Obviously, the mom here has opted to adopt the feeding schedule which the doctor has recommended. I understand that there are some babies who tend to oversleep making the observance of feeding time important.
@medigirl (15)
• United States
24 Feb 07
I believe in having a baby on a feeding schedule. It assures that the baby is receiving the nutrition it needs. If you think the baby is still hungry for food, you can modify the schedule or make sure the baby feeds more at the designated time. A schedule allows for the time that everyone needs, the mom, dad and other family members as well as the infant. It also allows for other time with the baby, just playing or bonding, reading to the baby, etc. A parent's soothing voice is sometimes what the baby wants and needs and we mistake it for being hungry. It worked very well for me and mine. On demand feeding can be disruptive, I guess it depends on how large the family is, who's working, etc.
1 person likes this
@danabfunny (100)
• United States
24 Feb 07
Well my son is 7 months old and i got him on a rountine.
Well,actually I got on his routine exept for nite time.
I just put some rice cereal in his bottle at nite so he will sleep al nite other than that no routine.
I'm don't think it's right to make them wait though if they rae hungry they are hungry and they will just cry untill they are fed.
So might as well feed them.Better baby them while you can they grow up and leave so fast.
2 people like this
@shall4548 (36)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Alot of people fell that it is important to keep their babies on a scheldule. Rather it be eating or sleeping. I have three boys and with my first the doctor mentioned it and some of my older friends spoke about schedules and b/c I was a new mom I tried but you know the baby is going to tell you when he/she is hungry.
None of my kids were on a feeding schedule. Not all babies are the same and some cant go as long as others.
I wouldnt woory about it as long as your baby is healthy and happy.
1 person likes this
@danishcanadian (28955)
• Canada
23 Feb 07
I think people schedule themselves more to check on the baby... the baby may be up and hungry at 3 AM when the rest of the family is asleep, nevertheless, it's important to get up and feed the baby. That's how I see it.
@mkirby624 (1598)
• United States
24 Feb 07
I've always heard of scheduled feedings, but only because the baby generally became hungry around the same times. But I have never heard of anyone not feeding their hungry baby because it wasn't on the schedule! That's just...sheesh.
@medigirl (15)
• United States
24 Feb 07
When you know how much your baby should be getting at the appropriate age, it's never hungry and not fed. You advance the amount of the feeding as the baby grows/ages. Eventually and rather soon, the baby will be taking 8 oz per feeding and it can be anywhere from every two hours to fours hours while awake. The baby always gets enough to eat and the mom can take a shower or whatever between feedings without feeling hurried, thinking that the baby will need to be fed. It's not for everyone but it works.
1 person likes this
@SageMother (2277)
• United States
24 Feb 07
I scheduled my twins from day one. The way you do this is to start at 4 hour intervals. YOu can feed the baby without them even waking up sometimes and their stomachs digest on schedule. It is not a conscious act on their part. At 3 months and 6 months..then 3 weeks and 6 weeks, they will go through growth spurts. during these times they will wake and fuss with hunger. When you see this happening you feed them every 3 hours, again not waiting for them to fuss from hunger.
That is how you schedule feedings.
@mrsanderson (271)
• United States
2 Mar 07
I guess I dont really believe in a schedule for babies. When I had my twins I did try to persuade them to eat at nearly the same times, especially at night, just for my own sanity. So whenever one ate, I would immediately try to get the other to eat. It didnt always work, but it worked well enough for me to get some sleep at night. I also tried the top them off thing...when I was ready to go to bed for the night I would rouse them a bit and feed them in hopes they would sleep longer and this usually worked also. I do agree that babies need routines, not schedules in my opinion. They need to feel comfort, that they know what to expect after certain events. I also saw a child in daycare with mine that the mother had a strict schedule for and witnessed this baby crying often when I was there to pick up or drop off mine. This is wrong in my opinion as they are learning as babies that we are there to meet their needs. If they cant learn to trust that we are meeting their needs, how is that going to affect them as they older?
@NatureBoy (493)
• Singapore
24 Feb 07
Personally, I think its only right to feed the baby when he's hungry. I feel like most of the responses that babies cry when they are hungry. About the overfeeding, just try to feed him a standard few times a day, but when he's hungry. They tend to be crying more when they are in the 1month to 2 momnth period say every 3 to 4 hours. After the period, they will be able to sleep longer hours. So they get more hungry when they wake up. Please feed them. I wouldn't like it if I had to wake up to no breakfast.
@StarChild517 (657)
• United States
13 Nov 08
I am so against the scheduling of a baby's feedings it is just illogical. I mean if your hungry your hungry its like starving the poor baby. I like to feed my baby whenever she is hungry so I don't have her being crazy fussy and cry nonstop until she gets fed. Sorry but I just hate the headaches from the crying.