Why I give "+" ratings to most people who write responses
@Radicalpatriot (665)
United States
February 23, 2007 5:34pm CST
If someone out there is going to spend the time and energy to respond to my discussions, they deserve a "+" rating. Only a foolish and useless response will get no rating, and I seldom give "-" ratings because the very fact that I got that response is a feather in that person's cap even if he or she is an idiot. Finally, I almost never use the "!" complaint flag because I feel that freedom of expression is important. Of course, Mylot.com has its own policies all of us have to follow. The bottom line is that I appreciate responses and will treat them well. Keep respoding! I love learning your opinions!
22 people like this
58 responses
@iluvmydaisy (333)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Thats good to know! I always give + ratings too. I didn't know what those were for till not too long ago! So you get a + from me!
4 people like this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
23 Feb 07
The tendency is for people, especially newbies, to post all the time and respond to nothing. That is no way to get earnings. You have to read others' views and respond, too, or the system slows and nobody earns anything.
@lauriefnp (5109)
• United States
23 Feb 07
This is good to know, and I hope that others read this and start doing the same. I believe as you do that most of the time if someone takes the time to post a response then they deserve the courtesy of an open mind and a (+) for the effort. The only time I would rate with a (-) is if the response is outwardly offensive, belligerent, or insulting to myself or another user. Fortunately, there are only a handful of people here who respond in such a manner. Your discussions tend to be controversial and they generate many different responses and opinions, and it's good to know that you don't take offense when someone states their case. It makes for a more enjoyable debate and discussion forum.
4 people like this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
24 Feb 07
So far as I have seen your material, you have really accomplished a lot here and your post numbers prove it. Your responses are always thorough, and I love your avatar. It is your trademark. Whenever I see it, I know I'm going to read something interesting!
3 people like this
@dana234 (2114)
• Spain
23 Feb 07
That´s more or less how I use the rating system. I fully agree with giving people a + because they took the time to reply to my discussions.
It´s good to know you rate all answers, I know, except the useless ones.
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
23 Feb 07
And the more I use the ratings system, the fewer and fewer stupid responses I get. I really like the network that's developing here. Working together equals market pull equals increased earnings.
3 people like this
@michelledarcy (5220)
•
23 Feb 07
Like you I rate everyone who makes a good effort to respond with a +. If people don't read the question or give a few words as a response I give a -ve especially if they have a higher rating than me as I feel they don't deserve one!
3 people like this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
23 Feb 07
You're right. People who just blast through and write down a couple words of gibberish should not be rated at all.
2 people like this
@rogen_andrei (638)
• Philippines
23 Feb 07
Same goes with me. I appreciate those people who spare a little time just to give some sensible responses to the discussions I've started. But sometimes we just can't help the fact that there are really people whose replies are far out. That's the only time I don't give any rating at all. I also give rating even to those responses of somebody else's discussions especially if I really like the way they deliver their thoughts.
3 people like this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
23 Feb 07
And what you have just written is prime example of what I mean. Clearly, you can write. Clearly, you know what you are talking about. This is the kind of response that makes this system take off and be a world-beater.
2 people like this
@RogerTheRabbit (1271)
• Portugal
23 Feb 07
Every time a make responses on discussions I also rate the discution with a +
I believe that rating is important and if someone here at mylot.com uses his time to give a opinion it deserves a rate. It's like that old saying "You get what you give".
3 people like this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Yes, and it should be noted that "+" ratings just shouldn't be given out like candy. The respondent needs to honestly give a coherent view or no rating.
3 people like this
@RogerTheRabbit (1271)
• Portugal
24 Feb 07
it's nice to see that the person also comments our posts. Every one should do that too!
2 people like this
@ESKARENA1 (18261)
•
23 Feb 07
blessed be my friend, i agree with you. I give plus ratings also to all who respond to my discussions. I will just ignore responseas that are off topic and will give negative ratings to those who post only one word or post i dont know. Blessed be
2 people like this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Hold on, though. Some of the best responses I get are negative. It's just that if a responder is negative without making a legitimate point, that's when they should be discrtedited and ignored.
3 people like this
@ESKARENA1 (18261)
•
24 Feb 07
oh my yes of course. I mean negative rating for non responsers or off topic, lol not negative in the sense that we disagree, that is fine and will get a plus from me if it is on topic, sorry for any confusion
blessed be
@kathy77 (7486)
• Australia
24 Feb 07
Yes I do the same as you I do not expect people to respond to my discussions without giving them a + rating, I seldom give out negative ratings,. Oh I have never complained since joining mylot I also love reading my responses I receive from my friends and members on mylot.
@nrnotrare (631)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Hello Radicalpatriot.....
All those foolish and useless comments should get a negative rating.....they are against mylots policies.
Also, the report option is there for a reason.....to be used to remove worthless discussions and comments. Check the do's and don'ts list.
Tom
@yvonitz_marian (117)
• Philippines
24 Feb 07
well, i do the same way too...honestly i'll give positive ratings to those who deserves my rating...for those response that were useless, i'll just leave it and never give a rating..i don't give negative rates for them, i just don't want..maybe because if i give - rating, it seems i made them lost their money...if they get - rate from the respondents, surely mylot will deduct it...tha's why i don't give any nagative rating...
@abroji (3247)
• India
24 Feb 07
In fact I know very little about the purpose of raring discussions and comments. Glad I could collect some important points from this thread. I use to grade opinions now and then. The disappointing thing is that not much responses are recieved to the discussions started by me. I am patiently waiting for some eyes to catch up discussions started by me. Thank you radicalpatriot for opening this discussion. I gathered very usefull tips from it.
1 person likes this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
24 Feb 07
You just said an important thing -- that you are disappointed that more people do not respond to your discussions. Guess what? The best for that to improve is to respond to others more and your avatar and knowledge will spread quite rapidly. Get a few friends and you're off to the races.
@garindelano (100)
• United States
24 Feb 07
Thanks for sharing the advice. Every day I find this site more interesting and fun.
1 person likes this
@amit_shehwag (836)
• India
24 Feb 07
fcourse priority should be given to those who spends more time to response..in compare to those useless one..itz a rule which must be followed to encourage the talented guys ....or persong who is applicable to get these grades..to continue their responses..
@KrauseHome (36447)
• United States
24 Feb 07
I personally have never seen if the + system helps with our earnings, but if someone responds well to one of my discussions or starts a discussion worthy of me giving it a "+" rating then I will do so as well. I have on occasion given a "-" but usually will save that for Poor discriminative responses. But it is Good we do have these Rating systems in place to keep this being a Fun place to come to each day.
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
24 Feb 07
At least the "+" can be used to at least acknowledge the responses. Sometimes I wonder if people who start discussions even bother to read the responses and, in turn, respond to them.
@shywolf (4514)
• United States
24 Feb 07
I absolutely agree! I very, very rarely give out minuses. The main time that I will do that is if someone replies yes, no or maybe, or I don't know, or responds with something that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the topic at hand. Other that that, I'll give out plusses for any reply, basically, even ones that are only a sentence long, as long as they pertain to the topic. I really don't like being negative towards people and giving out minuses. I would almost rather just leave their reply unrated unless I think that they are purplosely not following the rules. I love giving out plusses, though!!! ^_^
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
24 Feb 07
I consider it a high honor to get a response from one of your stature on this site. And, having perused your many posts, clearly you have excellent ideas and it is worth reading everything on your page. Your writing style is superb and very readable, even when you deal with a drab or even simplistic subject. I've already learned so much from your input and believe me I appreciate it. Keep on shining, Shywolf.
@retardedrugrat (4791)
• Canada
24 Feb 07
I usually post responses to other people discussions because I don't get many, if any responses to my discussions and quite frankly I find it a little bit disheartening.
Maybe the fact that I'm a relative newbie has something to do with it.
Anywayz, the few discussions I've done that have responses, I've given all of them a + rating, because I appreciate the time they took to respond with a well thought out reply.
I've had no reason to give someone a negative rating, and same with the complaint thing. I never had reason.
I would give a negative rating to someone who posted a useless and off topic response though and if someone was being downright abusive, I would report them right away.
1 person likes this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
24 Feb 07
You will find that the more you respond, the more you will receive in terms of responses to your own discussions. Right now the ideal ratio appears to be five or six responses to other peoples' discussions for every single discussion you initiate. That means that those who constantly post without responding to other peoples' discussions are trying for star ratings only which won't do them any good on earnings. You cannot "game" the Mylot.com system.
@boldriq (201)
• Slovenia
26 Feb 07
I like the intelectuall kind of discussions and yours certainly are, 'cose I took the liberty to check them out. But with this one you've graduated! As I'm new to this, I'm trying to get some new friends so they could post a response to my discussions as I'm going to post them at theirs. And so as I'm learning of the ways on how to make this site worth my while, I was wondering which kind of discussions attract more people and how inovative people are at attracting others to respond. I came to a conclussion, that the system mostly works upon the friends relationship. But there are some exceptions. Like this one. Yours. I mean, who would mind to be given a plus to their benefit, realy? And the good thing is, that your intentions to benefit from this, are positive. And you've managed to get the attention of everybody, not just the ones on your friends list. You are admirable.
And frankly speaking, I have the same principle. If someone responds to my posts, I grade them "+". Unless useless and selfish posts are the case. Be reading you soon... Regards to you...
1 person likes this
@beaniegdi (1964)
•
24 Feb 07
I wasn't sure how this rating works, if you are replying to someones post and you read the other posts do you rate them, or is it just the person who starts the discussion who rates the responses? Does that make sense? I only joined the other day and I had replied to loads before I realise I was adding comments which is different. I have a lot to learn.
1 person likes this
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
24 Feb 07
Well, let me tell you there is no sure-fire way to determine how the Mylot.com monitors figure out ratings. But because of the amazing number of participants, 73,000 and climbing, a computer program must be in play, both to record ratings and to award points and cash. Clearly, adjustments can be made. There is no way to "game" this system. Cutting and pasting are discouraged, even disallowed for the most part. There is no tolerance for abusive language or attitude. All energy is focused on gaining maximum content and maximum interaction between discussions and respondents. I really like it and I'm sure you will, too.