Who Should Be Able to Vote in U.S. Elections?
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
December 18, 2007 7:06am CST
According to the U.S. Constitution, all Citizens, 18 and older can vote in any state, county or city elections in the United States.
That makes sense to me, but I've read arguments that others should be allowed to vote. Some say that anyone living in the U.S. for a specified number of years should get to vote. Others say that anyone working in the US should get to vote. The most rediculous idea is, since what the U.S. does affects so many other countries, anyone living in any country should get to vote.
I think we should stick with the U.S. Constitution here. If others want the right to vote in U.S. elections, let them come here legally and fulfill the requirements for becoming a citizen.
3 people like this
11 responses
@smwilliams (647)
• United States
18 Dec 07
Im sorry, but in my opinion only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote. If you have been in this country for an extended number of years why havent you become a citizen? There is no excuse not to if someone has been here that long. If they were a citizen then they could vote. People can give me every reaon in the book as why they need to vote and yet are not a citizen and I will still stand firm about it.. If you want U.S. citizen priviledges then become a citizen. I hear many people say that they dont have the money to become a citizen and yet they are wearing expensive clothes and what not. Sorry..if things are important to you then you have to work for them and follow the rules like everyone else!
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Dec 07
Exactly!
There are a lot of reasons why people from other countries wouldn't want U.S. Citizenship, especially if it meant they would have to give up citizenship in their homeland. I know I wouldn't want to give up my U.S. Citizenship to gain citizenship in a country I happen to live in.
But I wouldn't expect the rights and privileges of citizenship there either.
@CatNPK (461)
• United States
19 Dec 07
Anyone with permanent residency has the same rights as any US citizen, and anyone legally in the country (even if just on a tourist visa) has some of the same rights (if they were a victim of a crime, for example). There are very few things that make a difference between a permanent resident and a citizen - can't vote, and can't work for some of the federal government divisions such as the CIA or the state department (although joining the army is OK). There are - as said - many reasons to not become an actual citizen. I have stalled for a long time because I did not want to give up my original citizenship (sorry, but it's Finland, and that's a really good country to have citizenship in). Now that Finland has changed its policy to allow dual citizenship, I will be getting my US citizenship eventually. For a while I was worried that the US would require me to drop my original one, but looks like that won't be a problem. Most citizens of any country (I'm not pointing fingers at anyone, this is just a general observation) have no idea what their own country's immigration policy is like. Immigrants come in many colors, and move for many different reasons. They should never be pegged into one big category.
1 person likes this
@smwilliams (647)
• United States
19 Dec 07
No one is pegging anyone into one big category. Im sure that you wouldnt want to drop your citizenship with your home country..I wouldnt either. However the fact of the matter is that if people want to vote in our elections wether you have lived here 1 or 20 years, have to become a U.S. citizen. Thats great that your country is offering dual citizenship and that you will be able to call both countries home. I dont agree with allowing anyone to just come and live here and expect to be able to vote for someone who runs my city/state/country..just on the basis that they work and live in the U.S. Thats a great start, but why not just finish what you started if voting is that important to you and make yourself a legal citizen. And thats not grouping people into the illegal status either...Im talking work Visa's and all that jazz also. And I know my immigration policies pretty well, but I also know the standards of being and becoming a U.S. citizen rather than demanding rights that dont rightly belong to a person. I know there are a lot of reason why people choose not to make it official, but then they dont need to be worried about voting either.
1 person likes this
@betsyraeduke (2670)
• United States
20 Dec 07
Anyone living in any country should be allowed to vote in US elections?!?!? ROFL! That's so stupid, it's funny! Who said that?! I want to award them a medal for taking the cake in complete idiocy! Yes, only US citizens of legal age should be able to vote in US elections. That should be common sense...however, some people lack that, don't they?
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
22 Dec 07
Believe it or not, there are many people in America who consider you and I bigots because we don't think non citizens should vote.
@betsyraeduke (2670)
• United States
22 Dec 07
Ah well, "the likes of me", has been accused of worse things. Lol.
1 person likes this
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
23 Dec 07
I agree with you. Only citizens should be able to vote. What has always bothered me about the voting is the age. Personally, I feel that the age limit for voting, drinking, and joining the military should all be the same age.
1 person likes this
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
23 Dec 07
I don't know all the history behind it all. I grew up in Louisiana for the longest time the drinking age here was really low, then they raised it to 18, then a few years later 21. All three, in my opinion, should be 21. Eighteen year olds are not old or life wise enough to make decision to join the military and I don't think they fully understand the consequences of drinking.
1 person likes this
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
20 Dec 07
I'm in full agreement.
If you're not a citizen and want a say, become a citizen or shut the hell up about it.
1 person likes this
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
20 Dec 07
Touche.
Free speech is a constitutional right, and should be a right worldwide, IMO. But--do constitutional rights apply to noncitizens? Seriously, outside of the civil liberties that all humans should have, do they?
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Dec 07
That's why We the People retain the authority to decide what the government can do and what it can't. We don't give the government the authority to silence anyone when it comes to political discussion, but we do give the government the authority to make laws about voting.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Dec 07
Ah, they can talk all they want, but they'll have to do their talking outside the ballot box. ;~D
1 person likes this
@LightninStrike (5915)
• Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
18 Dec 07
I understand and partially agree with what you're saying, para...one must set a limit, otherwise anyone in the world would be able to vote there. Here in Spain only Spaniards are able to vote in national and regional (your States) elections. But all EU citizens are allowed to vote and be elected, even as mayors, in local elections. It's like that in the whole EU, but doesn't affect more than local elections. Maybe in the states immigrants who had been living legally for a number of years could be allowed to decide what happens with the towns they live at...i'd find that fair. But to be able to vote in the national elections i agree that only americans should be allowed to vote, same as here.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Dec 07
Well, there is another difference between the US and Italy (and even the EU). Here in the US we don't have a "national election". We have 50 state elections. The only elected position in our government that represents the whole nation is the President.
Therefore, there really isn't a way to let people vote in a "national" election, but not in state and local elections.
Just for the record, I think it is sad that the nations of Europe have given up their sovereignty like that.
I remember travelling around Europe in a VW Bus in the 70s. Even though I was young, I loved how unique each country was. I doubt that uniqueness will last much longer.
@LightninStrike (5915)
• Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
19 Dec 07
I understand what you said about uniqueness, para, but really, I don't agree at all. I live in the EU and have traveled among EU countries often in the last years, and I don't see much changes at all. What EU did is basically getting ready to be an economical giant that can compete with the USA and China. And if you add up the power of our economies,it's working. That implies many many improvements in many areas, not only economical, but also related to nature preservation, security, Justice etc.
Bureaucracy now is way less annoying...but each country still has their own peculiarities, and nobody wants that to disappear...I think this is going towards a Confederation of National States where each one of us is still who he is now, but with the advantages of being a world's giant and not just a little small country.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Dec 07
The EU is still too young to have made an impact on local culture, we'll see how things are 20 or more years from now.
I do understand the economic reasons for creating the EU, and I really do hope each nation within the EU can maintain its cultural uniqeness.
@CatNPK (461)
• United States
19 Dec 07
As a long-ago immigrant, I am eligible for citizenship though have not yet taken the steps (I can't begin to describe the paperwork process, but one day I'll do it). As such, I often joke that I thankfully don't have to figure out which candidate to vote for. On a more serious level, I don't feel that voting makes much of a difference until the electoral college is abolished. Non-citizens shouldn't be able to vote - that is part of the definition of a modern nation state. Might as well decide the president by picking cards out of a hat or something. Instead of trying to say non-citizens should vote, it would be more productive to focus on getting rid of the electoral college in favor of direct voting counts.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Dec 07
Not becoming a citizen has a freedom all its own, doesn't it. ;~D
Getting rid of the Electoral College would rob the states of their voice in electing the president. It would also rob those living in less populated areas.... but that is a different subject.
I agree with you about the picking cards thing. If just anyone can vote, we might as well not bother with elections.
The presidential candidates aren't the only names on the ballot. If a citizen doesn't bother showing up to the polls because they don't think their vote for president matters, they are robbing themselves of the opportunity to vote in local, county and state elections.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Dec 07
Oh, and I agree, there needs to be massive reform in the legal immigration and naturalization process.
@Ravenladyj (22902)
• United States
18 Dec 07
I personally think its fine the way it is...I'm a Canadian living in the U.S so I can't vote over here and I have NO INTENTION of EVER giving up my Canadian or British status to become a citizen..It matters to me none if I can vote here..That being said, I think its JUST FOOLISH to think that just because someone works here (but doesnt reside) they should be allowed to vote...what would the purpose of that be?! I mean seriously...its the same with ppl who live in other countries...What in the hell would someone living in another country care who gets voted in? The U.S government is, above anything else, FOR THE U.S PPL not anyone else so why in the hell would the government even entertain the thought let alone actually consider allowing any Joe or Suzi Shmoe to vote in the U.S elections? Thats just ludacris IMO...
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Dec 07
Oh, I can see why someone living and working here in Sheboygan would want to be able to vote. However, voting is a right of citizenship not of residence.
I'm glad you care about your home country enough to not give up your citizenship there, even though you live here in the States.
@4ftfingers (1310)
•
24 Dec 07
I think the US citizens only should be allowed to vote.
But I think all countries should have some sort of system that only allows people with a certain amount of knowledge about politics to vote, maybe a few simple questions about each party's policies.
This is because I have a very annoying friend who voted for Tony Blair's Labour party, just because he 'looks like a good man'. I asked him which of his policies he agreed with and he couldn't name any.
I feel this is a problem in every country, people are wastign their votes by basing their judgement on celebrity or the achievements of their family. I'm sure this will be the deciding factor for many of Hillary's supporters.
Since politics is quite important to a lot of people, I think we should be able to stop the useless people voting.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
26 Dec 07
I agree, while we have the freedom to be ignorant, ignorance is usually what allows governments to take freedom away.
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
18 Dec 07
I don't think anyone other than a United States Citizen should be allowed to vote. It really irks me that people think we should give illegal immigrants drivers licenses which will lead to voting. If it is that important for someone to want the privilege to vote they will go throught he proper channels and do it. And it is absolutely ridiculous to think that foreigners should be allowed to vote in our elections. Talk about putting the "I" in idiot.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Dec 07
"Talk about putting the "I" in idiot."
And for that, I will put the "A" in Agree! ;~D
@kellys3ps (3723)
• United States
22 Dec 07
I think only citizens should be allowed to vote. I also seriously think they should bring back literacy testing. I can't tell you how many times I have cringed in line hearing people say, "What does this bill or initiative mean?" only to hear their neighbors reply. "Oh, just mark no, that is what I do if I don't understand something." GRRR!
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
23 Dec 07
I'm sure that neighbor marks "no" about a lot of things, and not just with voting. ;~D
@RowenaTheWitch (947)
• Italy
18 Dec 07
I agree with you: the right to vote is what distinguish citizens and not citizens, you can't change it! maybe for local votes like a mayor it's ok, but not for the president!
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 Dec 07
Nope, the mayoral and other local elections are even more important than the presidential election, since local governments have more impact on our lives than national ones do. Also, we can have more impact on local affairs than national ones.