Do you believe that Obama's news coverage is obsessive, or is it just me?

@tdavis (117)
United States
January 19, 2009 12:16pm CST
I am tired of all the news being about Obama, every news channel is falling all over them selves to cover this, and the rest of the news is like a caption on the bottom of the screen. I understand this is history in the making, cover the swearing in from start to finish, but please stop the step by step news cycle and its commentary. I am not a party person, I personally do not have or go to large parties no matter what the occasion. Birthdays, I get to chose the dinner, have a cake, with family. My retirement, eight people that i worked with and liked, came over for dinner. do you believe that the news coverage is obsessive or is it just me?
2 people like this
12 responses
@eyeh8f8 (44)
• United States
19 Jan 09
Considering that this is not just some local election, yeah, it is going to get covered a lot. They go a lot with what gets them the best ratings on the news. They are business people first, journalists second, and that pretty much goes for all of them, unless they are doing things for no profit.
@tdavis (117)
• United States
19 Jan 09
Correction, they are bsuiness people and then Democrates, there is no longer journalism.
• United States
20 Jan 09
There is corruption on both sides of the spectrum, lemme guess, you were told this by the non-liberal elite media known as "Fox News", who is so fair, right? If so, please tell me what makes them so much better than everybody else? These are the same people who you will hear them talk bad about the mainstream media as if they are somehow not within that threshold. Each company has it's agenda, CNN tries to fill what seems to be more of a centrists role, NBC is the counter of FOx in that it plays on the liberal crowd, and Fox goes for the right wing viewers. Now msot will end up saying that whatever they watch is justified and whatever everybody else watches isn't but look at it this way, if you only trust one source, you are screwed up.
• United States
20 Jan 09
I have been thinking the same thing and just do not understand it. They have not gone to all of this trouble with other innaugerations. I know this is historic but we all know that so they do not have to shove it down our throats all day and night. My husband was mad because he could not even watch HBO this weekend. It was mostly the innaugeration. All politicians are the same so it is not going to be any different.
@tdavis (117)
• United States
20 Jan 09
I was raised a democrat, small goverment, less taxation, protectors from big goverment and big business. Then about 20 years ago I realized that the dems had moved away and that the Reps were expounding the majority of the ideas I believed. Now, Bush has brought the reps into being a wing of the demo party. The difference between the two is getting smaller and smaller. Also Politicions are the same, just different sides of the coin. I felt that the landing on the moon was a big deal, but Obama's coverage makes that look like snow in the Rockie Mountains in January. Oh, well this is what happens when people learn that they can vote themselves money from the treasury.Lastly, this new idea of citizens of the world is scary, sounds like the lead in too a one world goverment, great the United nations with power. Sorry, I went on a rant, thanks for the comment.
@us2owls (1681)
• United States
19 Jan 09
The news covereage doesn't really bother me. Here in the UK we watch local news at 6 and national & international news from 6.30p.m. to 7 p.m. What irritates me the most is when they refer to Barack Obama as the first black President. The man is mixed race - he is NOT black. I intend to watch the inauguration tomorrow and hope that we get good coverage over here. Listening to the news I think the man has his work cut out for him. The whole world seems to be in an uproar. I would rather it be him than me trying to sort the mess.
@tdavis (117)
• United States
19 Jan 09
I wish our news here in the US waas that way. currently the local news runs through at fast forward to get to the national news and then the bordom begins. As far as race, here in the us at one time a drop of black blood was enough to consider you to be black, but that was still based more on the physical identifiers. I have mixed feeling about tomorrows festivities. The oath of office states in part to protect the consititution of the United States. I don't see anything in the consititution about taking money, from people that work and/or contribute to society, and give it to the ones that refuse to work under the pretext of a tax rebate. After all rebate means a return of money from the money that was given. Give none get none, or as the bible says, if they refuse to work don't feed them.
@ladym33 (10979)
• United States
20 Jan 09
I think his news coverage up to today has been very obsessive. But today I think it is acceptable because it is an important event, and it is also a historical time in history, so it does not bother me that all of television seems to have dedicated the day to this event. But Obama was getting a whole lot of press before this day, which was a little much.
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
19 Jan 09
The last few inaugurations the media was all over it two or three days before. I remember when Bush first was sworn in. It's the usual questions and comparisons about procedures, balls, gowns, attendance, and of course possible changes in politics. When I turned on the TV this morning and inauguration festivity reports were on all channels I had the same reaction as you did. I had to remind myself that usually around this time they are all over it reporting over the details, politics, international reactions, who is there, who refused,... I think we are just so tired of it because it's been so much. Obama's campaigns started two years ago. He has been in the news almost every day ever since. Pretty much every day for at least a year. Even after the election things didn't quiet down. It was as if he was already in office. So now being shown even more of the hoopla around him... well, fatigue does set in. The inauguration coverage in itself is not really obsessive at least not from the main channels. There are reports and coverages on channels and programs that wouldn't have cared about it in the past, I give you that. But in itself it's not really more this time around, it just feels like it. I give it another half a year. Then things will quiet down and people will start to take stock to see what really changed. The novelty will have worn off and the question will more be like "What have you done for me lately?" Other news will be more important.
@tdavis (117)
• United States
19 Jan 09
Jonesy, You maybe correct, it is just burn-out. It seems like all the other news is being upstaged, and treated like a commerical during a TV movie. Terry
• India
20 Jan 09
tdavis, I too think that the news channels are getting a bit carried over with Obama's inauguration. It must be because they want to increase their viewership ratings. We already know what we wanted to know about Obama, the rest we will get to know as he tackles day to day issues. There's really no need for such obsessive media coverage.
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
20 Jan 09
I think it is as well. I thought it was obnoxious pre and during election with the obsession with idolizing Obama. I thought it was weird for how little we really know about him. Im definitely getting bored of the whole thing.
@kareng (59050)
• United States
19 Jan 09
I've had enough of it too. We have a few movies dvr'd and shows and we will be watching them Tuesday night instead of all the re-runs for inauguration. As if 3-4 days of pre-inauguration coverage isn't enough, we get to watch it all over again Tuesday night? No thanks--I'll pass. Heck, I'm even passing on ALL the coverage. I think it IS obsessive and over the top. The money spent on this inauguration would be much better spent somewhere else.
@4ftfingers (1310)
19 Jan 09
I'm sick of it, and I don't even live in the US!
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
19 Jan 09
The word obsessive doesn't even begin to cover it. After the drooling and idolotry we saw durring the election, the win pushed things rigtht over the edge. Obama is being covered as almost messiahnic and it's SICKENING. This is someone we hired, to work for us, the american people, he is an employee, an elected servant and no more important that you or I. To asign seemingly diety status to such a man is reminesent of roman emperors or egyption pharo's. No other job in the country requires this much fan fare uopn being hired for it and this time around, it has gone way to far, it's embarrasing.
• United States
19 Jan 09
At lot of us are tired of it. It was a long election season this time around. The media has been eating and sleeping this election for two years now.We are all just ready for it be over already.
@jlamela (4898)
• Philippines
20 Jan 09
I am also tired of news coverage about Obama, it seems that people and the media want to canonize him early this time. The world is too excited with this man but I am not that very fanatic to judge him as a spectacular world leader right away. I will have to wait for the next three years is he is worthy of the post. I think the news coverage is super exaggerated. There are still worthy news around the town and not just the man who will swear his oath of office.