Why do you think Darwinian evolution theory leads logically to atheism?

Laptops are made by people. You can watch people assembling them. A plant comes out of a seed - a seed that didn't even exist the previous year. It seperates from its parent plant, and if the conditions around it are right, starts the process of turning into a plant all by itself. All living things are a collection of processes that run on autopilot. Even non-living systems like the weather, the water cycle just carry on without anything humanlike touching them. If you are a person who believes in God, you can believe that he was the one who got all this going, but machines made by man and the natural world are very different entities.

The existence of GOD vs Darwin So God is supposed to be a supernatural being or a superpowerful being who is the most perfect,who is believed variously to be the sole omnipotent creator, or at least the sustainer, of the universe. ( the terms could be plural/singular based on monotheistic or polytheistic beleifs) So God is the creator and the sustainer .......If God is all powerful,perfect etc then why did God create beings that are so very less perfect than the "divine self". Was that for Gods own personal amusement? If it was for amusement then why do the beings/ things created experience grief ....is it cos God may be sadistic .......well I dont refute the existence of "god"About/darwin .....i dont understand why you do think darwin is not a scientist? .....Scientists do propose theories that are never complete .......If any theory was totally complete at all points of time then there would be no need for a beleif in God ....On theother hand if you assume the existence of a powerful being why are secrets being divulged slowly/ why are secrets being hidden. Scientists do seem to "throw theories " out of water cos other people donot seem to have the inclination to "know " and hence never "think" (assumption 'God' assists 'we re lesser/mere mortals'concept. A simple example of scientist creating theories is "Gravitation" was created .....the force was not known to exist to mankind before .....mankind assumed that god had placed everything everywher.....and mind you gravitational theory has a lot of loophles......... No i donot intend to elevate or lower you to agnostism/atheism by not bein one who accepts things because generations before him/her did....... But then just thot it wont hurt you to kno most of the assumptions u made to create a beleif 4 yourself/ refute something are really not totally valid:) For eg:-Is the world moving on its own ......well there are theories t prove why it is:)

Sorry, but I have to disagree with you. Darwins theory has been proven more often than not.

Evolution is logical and there is evidence to support this. If everything was created then why do all things live and die, why is there so much hate and so much anger in the world? Science contradicts religeon and vice versa. Which ever of these two you were taugh when you were young is going to be the one you believe in. In my family we did not follow any religeous teachings. We had what the world had to offer out in front of us and we developed the necessary skills in order to get the things we wanted. It is science, not religeon that builds building, creates jobs, and governs humanity.

i believe in darwin......but i dont say there is no god......but r v the only ones in this universe who believes in god....

I disagree once with darwin theory. human being is human being, monkey monkey remain to become very differing once. special possible its ancestors of just darwin which monkey.... human being by the infinite created as human being non as animal.. agree all do not? darwin same is atheisme

i think its because the said theory did not include 'god' as the creator instead the theory stated that things here on this planet came out from i do not exactly know does atheism came about. but to think of the theory it is not really atheist to me for it merly says that 'we' evolve from some thing and where that some thing came from is really a big question. is god responsible for that some thing that 'we' evolve from or what..... greetings. : )

DARWIN theory based on hypothesis so no question of believing him in total,i agree with you.god has created everything according to the situation available on earth.Destiny is predestined buddy.A pix for u 2 cherish

I think understanding of the physical world has very little to do with religion and that atheism is false because it leaves a void of spirit

even darwin himself said that his theory was only after all a theory and he himself in his journals said he spend the last few years of his life believing in jesus as his savoiur. i have a treory that yaks milk can prevent ingrowing toenails but unless someone comes and proves it to me its just a though really

hey hasnt Darwin's theorey for human evolution been rejected? its eheist coz no religion like islam , christianity or judaism supports it they all say that the first human was Adam who was a prophet so his theory goes totally against it

Evolution is not the problem. Darwin's theory is the problem. He tried to explain away God. That is the real issue. He may have descended from monkey. But not all humans.

In my oppinion you can belive in a God creator and Darwin too. The point is that the bible is not a scientific book. So you can take Darwin theory and compare to the bible and see many common points.

i say that god didn´t create us , but i believe in one god , not in the GOD

some of his points like survival of the fittest are very important,and he is a scientist in biology

I think people came up with religions in large part for the reason you said, to explain design. However, after Darwin did research and explained it as a scientist, many people saw it for themselves and realized other parts of religion were similarly scientifically impossible.

I'm not an atheist but the truth in Darwin's theory can't be denied.whatever answers we have not got from science are termed as god.But one thing is sure.Whatever questions science answers it'll never end up with a solution but only another set of unanswered questions.thats science and thats where is god-the ultimate designer.

First of all, Darwin dedicated "on the origin of species" to God. He was not an atheist. Second of all, there's no logical reason why creationism and evolution can't go hand in hand. Third of all, if you're arguing in favor of Genesis, then you should also recognize this contradiction within it. Chap 1 says Noah took 2 or every animal. Chap 2 says Noah took 7 of every animal. Now, I'm not even sure if I"m agreeing or disagreeing with you at this point, because, to me, at least, your argument isn't very clear. My point is this, there's no reason why the Creator wouldn't have given his total creation the ability to adapt, grow, and become something better. In my opinion--I just don't understand atheism--someone had turn on the light switch. But God, is bigger than any one religion and certainly more than what any human written book can say about "Him".

well for one it doesnt even mention the existance of a God

First of all, for those who claim evolution as fact, you can not prove it any more than I can prove there is a God. No one was there at the beginning, except God, and you can not recreate the beginning in a lab. That is science. You can not prove or disprove evolution scientifically. Darwinism is a religion called Humanism. Secondly, you have two choices: In the beginning God: or In the beginning primordial ooze. Where did either come from? It's much easier for me to believe that God always existed than ooze. Where did the ooze come from?